Nemerle 1.0
nemerle.org
Nemerle 1.0
1–10 of 24 posts
Re: Nemerle 1.0
#2It looks a lot like python + javascript.
Re: Nemerle 1.0
#3Nemerle's coolest feature(or most evil, depending on your perspective) is its macros - it's one of the few modern languages that support them.
Re: Nemerle 1.0
#4It looks a lot like python + javascript.
static typed python+javascript
Re: Nemerle 1.0
#5Nemerle's coolest feature(or most evil, depending on your perspective) is its macros - it's one of the few modern languages that support them.
Exactly. AFAIK, it has small core language and all other constructions like if/else, while, for, foreach etc are made with macros.
I think that Nemerle is Lisp macros + static types + OCaml (algebraic data types, pattern matching) + .Net ecosystem (even Visual Studio support).
Re: Nemerle 1.0
#6Nemerle's coolest feature(or most evil, depending on your perspective) is its macros - it's one of the few modern languages that support them.
Exactly. AFAIK, it has small core language and all other constructions like if/else, while, for, foreach etc are made with macros. I think that Nemerle is Lisp macros + static types + OCaml (algebraic data types, pattern matching) + .Net ecosystem (even Visual Studio support).
how does it square typing with macros? is it typed after macro application?
Re: Nemerle 1.0
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. AFAIK, it has small core language and all other constructions like if/else, while, for, foreach etc are made with macros. I think that Nemerle is Lisp macros + static types + OCaml (algebraic data types, pattern matching) + .Net ecosystem (even Visual Studio support).
how does it square typing with macros? is it typed after macro application?
yes, but macros can operate with typed AST too
Re: Nemerle 1.0
#8Semicolons. Ew.
Re: Nemerle 1.0
#9Semicolons. Ew.
not nessesary with indent syntax http://goo.gl/EqeaD
Re: Nemerle 1.0
#10> The world of statically typed languages has the same framework (Scala’s Lift). But the implementation for Nemerle is based on macros and recognized standards such as LINQ.
I can't stand it when people parade around the "recognized standards" some company made up and then recognized on their own.