Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Strengthening iOS Privacy

daringfireball.net

171–180 of 187 posts

Re: Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Strengthening iOS Privacy

#171
There are probably other tobacco-company inspired tactics they could try, like funding the social media institute to show that there is no harm from facebook and how it is a more accurate source of information than newspapers or other media; also how instagram posting is positively correlated with being more attractive than average humans.

They could also sponsor courses in how to safely use social networking platforms.

Re: Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Strengthening iOS Privacy

#172
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quite the contrary. Word of mouth works wonders in small, tightly-knit communities that typically form around very small niches.

Right, but how do I find that tight-knit community (and begin to trust the people in it) if none of the people I currently associate with are interested in that niche & can introduce me to it?

They tend to cluster around a couple of websites or Facebook groups, so I would say Google. Reddit works as well, there are a lot of subreddits on any subject one would care to mention.

Re: Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Strengthening iOS Privacy

#174
This is one one hand incredibly satisfying to watch - seeing two multi billion companies decking it out in public.

On the other hand, it is crystal clear that a non-million-pound-gorilla entity simply has no chance in protecting consumers from advanced surveillance capitalism.

Re: Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Strengthening iOS Privacy

#175
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love to hate on Apple, especially the damage they've done to the internet (to chat in particular) but this was definitely the right thing for them to do.

What damage has Apple done to chat?

In certain parts of the world, it's extremely hard to avoid the closed iMessage platform since 95% of users use it. And you have to use their closed software and hardware to participate in the network.

Re: Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Strengthening iOS Privacy

#176
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love to hate on Apple, especially the damage they've done to the internet (to chat in particular) but this was definitely the right thing for them to do.

What damage has Apple done to chat?

Apple effectively doesn't allow community maintained chat apps. The push server must be run by the same organization that publishes the app, there is no way to sign keys of responsible push relay operators or anything like that.

Re: Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Strengthening iOS Privacy

#177
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right, but how do I find that tight-knit community (and begin to trust the people in it) if none of the people I currently associate with are interested in that niche & can introduce me to it?

Not from advertisements, that’s for sure.

Well of course, these types of communities aren't going to be paying for advertising because the communities themselves are generally going to be non-profit.

My point was if these communities are hard to find, targeted ads from small businesses in that niche might inform you of relevant products or services, not relevant communities.

Definitely not saying it's a perfect solution, or one that I like, just trying to point out it's not as black & white as people like to make out (especially on sites like HN)

Re: Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Strengthening iOS Privacy

#178
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right, but how do I find that tight-knit community (and begin to trust the people in it) if none of the people I currently associate with are interested in that niche & can introduce me to it?

They tend to cluster around a couple of websites or Facebook groups, so I would say Google. Reddit works as well, there are a lot of subreddits on any subject one would care to mention.

Sure, but how do I know if I can trust a random community I found via Google or on Reddit?

At least with ads (on a platform like Facebook), it's obvious they're ads and what their incentive is. With a random community, it may be unclear if people within it/the community itself is being paid by some company etc. Or if they have some other incentive to misrepresent the quality of certain products/services (e.g. recommending only what they can get affiliate links for).

Re: Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Strengthening iOS Privacy

#179
post #178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They tend to cluster around a couple of websites or Facebook groups, so I would say Google. Reddit works as well, there are a lot of subreddits on any subject one would care to mention.

Sure, but how do I know if I can trust a random community I found via Google or on Reddit? At least with ads (on a platform like Facebook), it's obvious they're ads and what their incentive is. With a random community, it may be unclear if people within it/the community itself is being paid by some company etc. Or if they have some other incentive to misrepresent the quality of certain products/services (e.g. recomme…

Yes, you don't know whether you can trust a forum that's been up since 2004 whose only reason to exist is to discuss $topic. The rockbox forum for example, how would you know those guys _actually_ like cfw for mp3 players and don't just want to scam your crypto away?

Ads on the other hand you can trust to lie to you 100% of the time. Ads are never honest, their only intention is to fool you to buy something you don't need.

I legitimately don't understand how _anyone_ would think he gains any value from reading dishonest corporate propaganda, less how he would think "hey, thats nice! I'll buy that!"

Re: Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Strengthening iOS Privacy

#180
post #178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, but how do I know if I can trust a random community I found via Google or on Reddit? At least with ads (on a platform like Facebook), it's obvious they're ads and what their incentive is. With a random community, it may be unclear if people within it/the community itself is being paid by some company etc. Or if they have some other incentive to misrepresent the quality of certain products/services (e.g. recomme…

Yes, you don't know whether you can trust a forum that's been up since 2004 whose only reason to exist is to discuss $topic. The rockbox forum for example, how would you know those guys _actually_ like cfw for mp3 players and don't just want to scam your crypto away? Ads on the other hand you can trust to lie to you 100% of the time. Ads are never honest, their only intention is to fool you to buy something you don't…

Ah of course, all niche communities have existed for 16 years...

Your example of rockbox forum seems disingenuous because I assume they're not recommending you buy particular products (maybe recommending some particular mp3 players that the cfw works well on, but I think they try to target a wide range of players).

> Ads on the other hand you can trust to lie to you 100% of the time.

Exactly my point. You know exactly what you're getting and what their incentive is.

Well actually, maybe not exactly my point - it's pretty clear to me that ads do not "lie to you 100% of the time". Some ads are going to exaggerate the quality of their products etc., but some ads literally just inform you "this is a thing that is available", which is typically an easily provable claim.

But the point is that yes, with ads you know that it's being paid for by the people who have a direct financial interest in you buying the thing. You can make an informed decision.

Post reply on HN