Live data from Hacker News

No Cookie for You

github.blog

11–20 of 634 posts

Re: No Cookie for You

#11
For other sites I recommend the extension "I don't care about cookies". It removes most cookie warnings, makes browsing the web way less bothersome.

You can also add cookie warning filters to uBlock Origin, but those doesn't autoclick when CSS filters aren't sufficient.

https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/i-dont-care-about-cookies/

Re: No Cookie for You

#14
I assume that means a lower ad revenue and lower quality analytics. I wager they did a study and found the benefits of removing the dialogs outweigh the costs.

Cookie dialogs are indeed horrible and out of control. Good on them for making the jump. But I doubt many others can justify the cost associated with the change. We need a better solution that gives users choice but reduce the friction caused by annoying prompts.

Re: No Cookie for You

#15
This is great! GitHub continues to, somehow, surprise me.

One question I do have, however, is whether or not the new homepage[0] which shows where people are when they open a PR actually reveals their present location. In the few samples I checked it did not seem that the presence of the person indicated matched their bio's location settings. If it is truly unmasking people's location I think it should be opt-in only, since it is private information. An employer or state may have issues with someone opening a PR from a specific country at a specific time, for example.

[0] It may be required to open this in an incognito browser.

Re: No Cookie for You

#16
I'm an American that's currently in Europe, and I recently downloaded a mobile ad-blocker for the purpose of blocking cookie popups. I was already blocking most tracking at the DNS level, so this was mostly for cosmetic purposes. Blocking consent banners has made browsing the mobile web so much more pleasant.

Re: No Cookie for You

#17
post #4

Have they found some alternative to cookies?

Cookie is a technical solution. The law isn't about cookies but about privacy.

The alternative to asking permission to do intrusive things is to avoid doing intrusive things.

Re: No Cookie for You

#18
post #9

If they've gotten rid of 3rd party analytics, does this mean they're just using their own? Presumably session cookies count as "required", and could be used to track your actions at least on github.com.

Sure, but considering GitHub doesn't have advertising[1], and they're not sending it to a third party (like Google, who does), it's very hard to imagine any use for first party "tracking" that might harm you.

Presumably the most they're using this for is recommending potentially interesting repos to you.

[1] Potential concern would be if "Microsoft" was considered "their own", since Bing does have an ad network. But my guess is between still having separate accounts and being treated as separate companies, that is not the case here... yet.

Re: No Cookie for You

#19
Can anyone familiar with the topic explain what distinguishes essential from non-essential cookies?

GitHub gives the example of "those used by third-party analytics, tracking, and advertising services", but curious if the law defines some sort of bright line here.

Re: No Cookie for You

#20

That was an unexpected nice gesture. I wonder what they’re using to track user activity instead, probably just a mix of server logs and the other goings on of the backend.

Your user session. It can even be a cookie still, because that session cookie will be required for it to work.
Post reply on HN