This is the balkanization of the internet. We've lived through a brief period of free exchange among peoples, but it's soon over. I predict only one viable future for all technology companies, big and small: Pick a single national jurisdiction, keep your employees and servers inside it.
I wouldn't really call it balkanization. Most services still operate across borders. Thanks to the internet I have contact to peers from all over the world. Some aspects of the internet will become more localized in the future, but generally inter border communication is still growing I think. And in fact on an EU level, rules are unified instead of balkanized. The digital single market project brought things like th…
Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules
41–50 of 506 posts
Re: Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules
#42Tech companies, or any company for that matter, will do what is best for themselves. Regulations exist to protect consumers and other companies from accusative behaviors. Remove the regulation and the 'we care for your privacy' message disappears with it. Because they never cared for your privacy, they will just doing what was mandatory.
Re: Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules
#43So where will they be paying tax now if not Ireland?
(the Republic of) Ireland is not part of the UK, and remains in the EU.
This is about end user licence/privacy/terms agreements, not corporate taxation.
Re: Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Regulations are fluid and often end up raising the barrier to entry often stifling the competition.
Companies are often fluid, especially smaller ones, and can more easily adapt to a changing world.
That doesn’t necessarily mean that there aren’t other justifications for any given regulation. But ain’t no small business owner or entrepreneur in history ever said “Boy! All these regulations sure are making my life easy”
Re: Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules
#45Re: Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules
#46How these rules apply for people with multiple citizenships and residence? That’s the case with a lot of people in Europe. How to find out to which jurisdiction my FB data is bound to?
Re: Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules
#47Personally, I think the GDPR cookie notifications have severely degraded the user experience of the web. I also think it's become just another "Terms and Conditions" - something that people reflexively accept because they want to get on with using a product. Future regulations with teeth, but don't exist yet, are things like: - Data portability: I should be able to export my entire Facebook account in full in a stand…
I still wonder what the 'legitimate interests' of ad companies are. I also wonder if rejecting the cookies actually works, it's not like I can check right?
Re: Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules
#48How these rules apply for people with multiple citizenships and residence? That’s the case with a lot of people in Europe. How to find out to which jurisdiction my FB data is bound to?
Just because I'm a Britsh person living in the US doesn't mean I'm not subject to the death penalty or am exempt from having to buy health insurance, for example.
Re: Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules
#49Re: Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules
#50Welcome to the United States of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.