Live data from Hacker News

Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

ktvu.com

401–410 of 622 posts

Re: Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

#401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The east coast has entire Ivy League and yet no Silicon Valley. Also, how do you explain Seattle?

Many of the brightest on the East Coast get sucked into finance.

This. Even ignoring the number of students that go study banking/finance in college, the banking/finance industry also employs many CS and math graduates.

Re: Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

#402
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. They're companies trying to avoid taxes or regulation. Only companies on the downslide really consider that as an relevant option.

To be fair, here's the complete list of companies in the known universe that don't try to avoid taxes or regulation: [error data not found] There's a cost of moving. California's taxes and regulations are bad, bad enough to force many out, but not all. If things continue on their present course, even Google and Amazon, who personally like the political climate there, will have to start looking elsewhere.

Most startups don't care about taxes or regulations. Taxes are a rounding error (or literally zero) when you're small and not making any money, which will be the first several years of a startup's life. When you get big you can hire an army of lawyers and accountants to keep all your money in Ireland and avoid them. Regulations just get ignored. When you're small, you're too little a fish to go after; the regulators are busy suing Uber and Lyft and Facebook and Google. When you get big, you can hire an army of lobbyists and PR people to change the regulation, just like Uber and Lyft did.

Re: Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

#403

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oracle leaving for Texas reminded me of this person: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18442941 People getting excited for Texas seems a bit silly! Real tech hub but... this is Oracle. C'mon.

The damage to CA's economy won't come from the has-beens leaving, but the never-will-be's that never happen. It's hard to have a ramen startup when your garage costs a million dollars. SF has been operating on the "Get Big Quick" financial injection model for a while now, so it probably won't stop those types of companies. But we shouldn't pretend that there's been a good environment for the idyllic startup in at lea…

> It's hard to have a ramen startup when your garage costs a million dollars.

Word.

Peter Thiel had something to say about this - basically, he said that so much of the VC money that a start up would raise would go to rent that it no longer makes sense to start a company in the Bay Area.

And those garages in Austin, Nashville, Charlotte, Railegh-Durham, and basically every where else are starting to look very attractive to savvy start up founders. Especially under the WFH circumstances bc of covid.

Re: Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

#404

The real state I wonder about is Illinois. Who the hell wants to live in Illinois? Both the state income tax and property tax is absurd and you can easily cross state lines to somewhere cheaper with pretty much the same scenery.

Have you never been to Chicago? Pretty nice town.

It's nice from May to October.

I almost died when I visited in February.

Re: Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

#405

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you never been to Chicago? Pretty nice town.

Nice to visit, wouldn't want to live there. Did I mention it's the murder capital of the United States?

Meh. Yes, sure, by statistics. But those rates come from neighborhoods that most likely don't have a lot of six-figure salary tech workers in them.

Re: Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

#406
post #379
post #16

HP and Oracle don’t exactly represent the heart of Silicon Valley today and what makes it special/unique. I actually think zombie corporations like Oracle, companies that haven’t innovated in decades and instead rely on an army of sales people to sell legacy software, are somewhat the antithesis of Silicon Valley which is really about real technological innovation and disruption at it’s core. I know there are lots of…

"HP and Oracle don’t exactly represent the heart of Silicon Valley today and what makes it special/unique. I actually think zombie corporations like Oracle," This sentiment is problematic. Oracle has 130 000 employees and $40B in revenue. That's massive. They are a tech company, not a media company like FB. They are a lynchpin, just because 'we don't like them' doesn't make them 'not' that. It's like Burning Man: eve…

I agree with everyone's sentiment that Oracle and HP are dinosaurs lead by people in the finance department, but I also agree with yours. These companies are also canaries. We've crossed the tax and bureaucracy threshold that companies are willing to deal with.

I predict that it will continue to be a slow transition until a tax friendly state with a decent tech hub joins California, Montana, North Dakota, and Oklahoma in banning non-competes. If that ever happens, California is in deeper trouble.

Re: Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

#407

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you never been to Chicago? Pretty nice town.

It's nice from May to October. I almost died when I visited in February.

You're not living unless the winter weather almost kills you when you're walking the dog!

Re: Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

#408

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Proposition 13, mentioned by a sibling comment.

Two counterpoints: - Direct your discontent toward the corporations and landlords who are exploiting Prop 13 when it wasn't intended for them. It was intended to protect homeowners (often on retirement income) from skyrocketing property values that is out of their control. It's done great at that, but unfortunately (like any regulation) has also been exploited by the greedy. - That aside, don't presume to be entitled…

From their perspective, of course it would be unfortunate that your parents cannot continue to have their lifestyle subsidized. For the rest of us, that money could gladly be used for schools, infrastructure, etc

Luckily, if someone is being priced out by fair property taxes, they still own a valuable asset.

Re: Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

#409
post #380

These companies leaving for Texas will not have a negative impact on the Bay Area, but it will have a positive impact on Texas. One of the things I didn't see mentioned in the comments here is the contribution of immigrants in Bay Area tech scene. And CA, with Bay Area in particular is very friendly to immigrants from all over the world. A very large percentage of those will never move to Texas, well unless this migr…

Is the Bay Area really friendly to all immigrants in a way that metropolitan Texas is not? I think the definition of friendly should include being able to afford decent space to live. I could imagine that for a young well off Chinese or Indian engineer many cultural aspects such as food and being around many members of your community would be preferable in the Bay Area certainly. But Houston is of the most foreign born cities in the US and for less skilled immigrants their pay check will go much further in Texas.

Re: Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving for Texas

#410
post #363

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I totally agree and I think property taxes are way more fair and equitable for a society than income taxes. Usually we tax behaviors we want to curb. Income taxes disincentivize people from earning more, whereas property taxes are a consumption tax. In my mind this makes way more sense, and there's good data to suggest property taxes are the best/most efficient way to gain needed revenue for a city but do the least "…

"I totally agree and I think property taxes are way more fair and equitable for a society than income taxes." Until you retire and no longer can pay the tax and are kicked out of your home. Logically, it makes more sense to tax people who are actually making money (income and capital gains) since that means they actually have money. Taxing people on a fundamental need (shelter) could potentially increase homelessness…

Couldn't you give property tax breaks to retirees, or to people temporarily out of work?
Post reply on HN