How the novel coronavirus has evolved
graphics.reuters.com
How the novel coronavirus has evolved
1–10 of 137 posts
Re: How the novel coronavirus has evolved
#2Re: How the novel coronavirus has evolved
#3And I was downvoted on HN for merely asking the question whether coronavirus could mutate: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24035686
Re: How the novel coronavirus has evolved
#4And I was downvoted on HN for merely asking the question whether coronavirus could mutate: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24035686
Re: How the novel coronavirus has evolved
#5And I was downvoted on HN for merely asking the question whether coronavirus could mutate: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24035686
HN has an tendency of becoming a hivemind like reddit due to the intellectual pride of the overpaid CRUD technologists that reside here
Hey!
Re: How the novel coronavirus has evolved
#6And I was downvoted on HN for merely asking the question whether coronavirus could mutate: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24035686
They should rename HN to HM, HiveMind.
Re: How the novel coronavirus has evolved
#7And I was downvoted on HN for merely asking the question whether coronavirus could mutate: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24035686
[flagged]
It's much worse than that.
Because most HNers have almost no actual knowledge or experience, you have to provide two links for them to read to get up to speed on virtually any topic.
I've done experiments on HN readers where virtually all of my posts are downvoted or flagged, but adding 2 links will usually get them upvoted. No difference in tone or opinion.
So if you read HN, you're also my personal guinea pig. Thanks! :)
Re: How the novel coronavirus has evolved
#8Re: How the novel coronavirus has evolved
#9Is this why some are saying we might need a booster shot in a few years?