61–70 of 241 posts
I'm using Firefox (Nightly) on a Windows 10 tablet (Microsoft Surface Go).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure but - as film e.g. captures actual photons from the scene, probably some kind of information is encoded through that. Bokeh is a kind of of space representation, similar to how you can basically "see" through hearing a sound stage of instruments separated properly when someone has a really good sound system, or how dogs have "5.1/7.1" sense of smell. How does one encode that I have no idea.
Look into light field photography tech. It is possible to capture a ”volume of light”, within which bokeh & more can be adjusted after the fact. Issue is the amount of data generated and complexity of tech versus getting a ”good enough for most situations” image via simpler means (regular photo). Regular + depth images (Apple LiDAR etc) with help of AI can create something vaguely similar to actual bokeh, but they’re…
The website sliders don't work well with a touch interface. If I use a mouse, I can smoothly move the slider values. But attempting to tap and slide them either has no response or makes the slide move to the extreme left or right. I'm using Firefox (Nightly) on a Windows 10 tablet (Microsoft Surface Go).
Although I knew most of technical aspect described having immersed myself in Photography several years ago, I cannot express properly how GOOD this article is. The sliders and diagrams are brilliant for helping a layperson understand how it all works. Kudos!
The website sliders don't work well with a touch interface. If I use a mouse, I can smoothly move the slider values. But attempting to tap and slide them either has no response or makes the slide move to the extreme left or right. I'm using Firefox (Nightly) on a Windows 10 tablet (Microsoft Surface Go).
I have a question for the more knowledgeable: Color filters on the sensor split the light into three wavelength ranges - red, green, blue. Then photosites measure intensity of light, which means that sensor only knows that the incoming photon is "roughly green", but doesn't actually recognize its precise wavelength. So e.g. when the light is pure orange, it falls down into red wavelength range and is counted as red.…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_vision#Physiology_of_col...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Actually being Polish I can say it is correct, at least for the cases mentioned (also correct for suffix -cki). However it is true that there are surnames that do not follow this particular inflection scheme. Keep in mind that Poles are likely to use a single, male variant of the surname, rather than explain the intricacies of inflection in the Polish language.
-A former girlfriend is of a Russian emigré family; she always got a chuckle out of Norwegians' inability to understand the concept of inflection. Her father as a matter of course got letters from all her leisure activities, school &c addressed to 'Mr. Yuri ----skaia'. - as her last name was ----skaia, obviously his would be, too. At least for us inflectionally challenged Norwegians.