Live data from Hacker News

To Lose Weight with Exercise, Aim for 300 Minutes a Week

nytimes.com

21–30 of 145 posts

Re: To Lose Weight with Exercise, Aim for 300 Minutes a Week

#21
post #2

That's 50 minutes per day with a day off per week. Two pomodoros. E.g. cardio in the morning and resistance in the afternoon. That sounds like a lot to fit into a busy life, but a low price if it's all it takes to emulate the health of the hunter gatherers we evolved from.

I suspect eating less is far more palatable than 50 minutes of exercise per day.

You have to do both -- the body needs proper stressors.

Re: To Lose Weight with Exercise, Aim for 300 Minutes a Week

#22
The majority of weight is lost through respiration, that's the C in CO2. Exercise is great for health, and does help weight loss. But diet is the only thing that is going to resolve this. You consume far more calories in a regular sized Milkyway then you're going to burn exercising in 50 minutes that's for sure. Here's a chart of just those tiny "fun sized" Halloween candies. https://www.popsugar.com/fitness/What-Takes-Burn-Off-Hallowe...

Re: To Lose Weight with Exercise, Aim for 300 Minutes a Week

#24
Bad title. The study referenced is claiming that the compensatory rise in appetite that comes with exercise seems to be about 1000 calories per week. So only working out 1000 calories worth doesn't help, but working out more does.

Of course, the best way to lose weight is to clean up a bad diet. One unhealthy meal--or even a snack--can completely undo the calorie deficit of all but the most intense workouts.

Re: To Lose Weight with Exercise, Aim for 300 Minutes a Week

#27
I wanted to not have to wonder why my weight was suddenly 30 pounds more than in college, without me remembering how that ever happened.

I started exercising with some light running, gym use, breaking a little sweat. Didn't do anything, didn't show any noticeable result over like 4 months.

Then I hopped on a rowing machine (above preparation probably helped to be ready for it) because I wanted to see something happen. I'm not that special. Do something to your body and it will probably do the same for you as it does for other people, you just have to stick with it. I stopped thinking "eh, it won't do anything for me".

I rowed each day before the weights workout, 10 minutes super intense, until I felt like I was gonna puke as I fell off the machine. Heartbeat way elevated, out of breath, blood coursing through body, and soaked.

In conjunction with not eating quite as much (that rowing machine does something to your appetite) I dropped I would say 1 pound per week. Doctor asked if anything was wrong the next time I went in for physical and got weighed. Felt great.

Exercise is a part of my routine now. I don't eat junk any more. I now say the thing people always say after such things, but you don't internalize or believe it until you try: "I wish I had done it sooner".

Re: To Lose Weight with Exercise, Aim for 300 Minutes a Week

#29

A few years ago I decided I was sick of being overweight and decided to make a change. My approach was two-pronged: 1) eat better, 2) exercise. For eating, I cut out as much sugar as I reasonably could. For exercise, I made sure I "moved vigorously" for 30 minutes per day, every day. I was never a runner. And in my early shape, that 30 minutes was just me walking. Eventually, though, I stopped sweating and being out…

I’m jealous, I’ve been jogging since May this year and 5 miles in 35 minutes is way faster than I can go. You could easily break a 20 minute 5k at that pace!

Re: To Lose Weight with Exercise, Aim for 300 Minutes a Week

#30

A half hour a day while improving your diet (Pick one: cut booze, fast until afternoon, cut bread, cut soda) is a lot easier to maintain. I ride an exercise bike for a half hour a day while working from home.

I mean, cut soda, period. The other options you mention have downsides, but there is no downside to cutting soda out of your life. Get rid of that trash. (Coffee-flavored milkshakes, too.)
Post reply on HN