What is the context behind this?
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2020-Dece...
Centos.rip
11–20 of 144 posts
Re: Centos.rip
#12I think we all knew this was coming when IBM acquired RedHat. Does anyone know if the licensing is permissive enough to enable Centos spin-offs? If that's possible there's a decent chance some company will jump on it and fill the void.
I honestly hope this is what's going to happen.
Re: Centos.rip
#13Re: Centos.rip
#14Re: Centos.rip
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2020-Dece...
Oh, wow. I'm running CentOS 8 on my home server. Anyone have any recomendations for a good, stable, home server OS?
I should probably give a look at openSuse...
Re: Centos.rip
#16Re: Centos.rip
#17SourceHut runs entirely on Alpine, as do my personal workstations. It is extremely reliable, stable, and robust; maintainable over long periods of time with minimal effort; and small and simple enough to be easily understood by everyone responsible for its use on your teams. The package repositories are somewhat small - you may have to write some packages yourself, but don't be afraid of that. It's very easy and you would be well-advised to learn how it's done if you're going to invest in any distro.
I consider Alpine Linux to be a competitive advantage for my business. CentOS and RHEL provide the illusion of stability and an executive who will weep and beg for forgiveness when it breaks, but true stability is only possible through simplicity.
Re: Centos.rip
#18I think we all knew this was coming when IBM acquired RedHat. Does anyone know if the licensing is permissive enough to enable Centos spin-offs? If that's possible there's a decent chance some company will jump on it and fill the void.
In the same family of RHEL clone distros there is at least:
* Oracle (yuk)
* Scientific Linux (though I don't think they attempt to guarantee binary compatibility as CentOS does/did)