Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, but in those days we did that because there wasn't any other option. It's not like the colour scheme of the monochrome terminal was chosen for ergonomic reasons. If anything, amber terminals were easier on the eyes. Or the white on black ones. Those were nice.
Was going to say the same thing. It was well known at the time that amber was better, but manufacturers mostly continued pumping out green anyway.
ImHex – A Hex Editor
41–50 of 85 posts
Re: ImHex – A Hex Editor
#42Re: ImHex – A Hex Editor
#43The title seems pretty unkind to the project and I almost skipped it. “Bleh bleh yet another hex editor”. But this has some nice features! For example, it can parse the executables, and show structures: Disassembler supporting many different architectures ARM32 (ARM, Thumb, Cortex-M, aarch32) ARM64 MIPS (MIPS32, MIPS64, MIPS32R6, Micro) x86 (16 bit, 32 bit, 64 bit) Just to start, along with a ton of other file parsin…
Re: ImHex – A Hex Editor
#44The title seems pretty unkind to the project and I almost skipped it. “Bleh bleh yet another hex editor”. But this has some nice features! For example, it can parse the executables, and show structures: Disassembler supporting many different architectures ARM32 (ARM, Thumb, Cortex-M, aarch32) ARM64 MIPS (MIPS32, MIPS64, MIPS32R6, Micro) x86 (16 bit, 32 bit, 64 bit) Just to start, along with a ton of other file parsin…
In the screenshot, there is one for "data information" - in that, what does the byte distribution and entropy chart help in understanding?
Re: ImHex – A Hex Editor
#45Re: ImHex – A Hex Editor
#46Re: ImHex – A Hex Editor
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
From their "About" section & README: > A Hex Editor for Reverse Engineers, Programmers and people that value their eye sight when working at 3 AM. Or their announcement page ( https://werwolv.net/projects ): > A Hex editor with data pattern support and many features useful for Reverse Engineers Maybe "ImHex - A Hex Editor for Reverse Engineers" would be a better title?
This looks a much better title and match.
Re: ImHex – A Hex Editor
#48http://ridiculousfish.com/hexfiend/ Another open source macOS one to consider.
Re: ImHex – A Hex Editor
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Submitted title ("ImHex – A Hex Editor for people that value their eye sight") seems distracting and baity, so I've shortened it for now. If there's a better (more accurate and neutral) title, we can change it again.
From their "About" section & README: > A Hex Editor for Reverse Engineers, Programmers and people that value their eye sight when working at 3 AM. Or their announcement page ( https://werwolv.net/projects ): > A Hex editor with data pattern support and many features useful for Reverse Engineers Maybe "ImHex - A Hex Editor for Reverse Engineers" would be a better title?
The union of "reverse engineers" and "programmers" is just "programmers", and that basically means "a hex editor for people who use hex editors". No?
Re: ImHex – A Hex Editor
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
From their "About" section & README: > A Hex Editor for Reverse Engineers, Programmers and people that value their eye sight when working at 3 AM. Or their announcement page ( https://werwolv.net/projects ): > A Hex editor with data pattern support and many features useful for Reverse Engineers Maybe "ImHex - A Hex Editor for Reverse Engineers" would be a better title?
I saw that, but could not find anything that's especially for reverse engineers. The union of "reverse engineers" and "programmers" is just "programmers", and that basically means "a hex editor for people who use hex editors". No?
You should know better than to draw that equivalence, dang.