Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

news.ycombinator.com

111–120 of 197 posts

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#111
post #54

Attention Is All You Need https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 It's from 2017 but I first read it this year. This is the paper that defined the "transformer" architecture for deep neural nets. Over the past few years, transformers have become a more and more common architecture, most notably with GPT-3 but also in other domains besides text generation. The fundamental principle behind the transformer is that it can detec…

“it can detect patterns among an O(n) input size without requiring an O(n^2) size neural net” This might be misleading, the amount of computation for processing a sequence size N with a vanilla transformer is still N^2. There has been recent work however which has tried to make them scale better.

You raise an important point. The proposed solutions are too many to enumerate, but if I had to pick just one currently I would go for "Rethinking Attention with Performers" [1]. The research into making transformer better for higher dimensional inputs is also moving fast and is worth following.

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.14794

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#112
https://web.stanford.edu/group/dlab/media/papers/chenNBT2020...

Deep brain optogenetics without intracranial surgery

"Achieving temporally precise, noninvasive control over specific neural cell types in the deep brain would advance the study of nervous system function. Here we use the potent channelrhodopsin ChRmine to achieve transcranial photoactivation of defined neural circuits, including midbrain and brainstem structures, at unprecedented depths of up to 7 mm with millisecond precision. Using systemic viral delivery of ChRmine, we demonstrate behavioral modulation without surgery, enabling implant-free deep brain optogenetics."

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#113
post #29

Here's a wonderful one I read a little over a year ago: "Estimating the number of unseen species: A bird in the hand is worth log(n) in the bush" https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07428 https://www.pnas.org/content/113/47/13283 It deals with the classic, and wonderful, question of "If I go and catch 100 birds, and they're from 20 different species, how many species are left uncaught?" There's more one can say about that tha…

Is it similar to the german tank problem?

The German tank problem is easier because it assumes the tanks have sequential serial numbers.

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#114

This Nature paper, Non-invasive early detection of cancer four years before conventional diagnosis using a blood test https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17316-z Major breakthrough in cell-free diagnostics. The methylation pattern of DNA can be used to identify early-stage cancer, i.e. circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has a distinct methylation pattern. The results are based on data from a ten year study which mu…

Small correction: the paper is in Nature Communications and not Nature.

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#115
post #29

Here's a wonderful one I read a little over a year ago: "Estimating the number of unseen species: A bird in the hand is worth log(n) in the bush" https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07428 https://www.pnas.org/content/113/47/13283 It deals with the classic, and wonderful, question of "If I go and catch 100 birds, and they're from 20 different species, how many species are left uncaught?" There's more one can say about that tha…

> But mostly I just love the name. Apparently PNAS had them change it for the final publication, sadly. Big game from an organization with that acronym.

We used to joke in grad school that PNAS stands for Paper Not Accepted in Science.

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#118

Builds systems à la carte: Theory and practice https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/c... I've always hated build systems. Stuff cobbled together that barely works, yet a necessary step towards working software. This paper showed me there's hope. If we take build systems seriously, we can come up with something much better than most systems out there.

This is my favorite paper now for 2 years in a row :)

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would argue that input scaling is not fundamental to Transformers. Recurrent neural network size is also independent of input sequence length. The successful removal of inductive bias is really what differentiates this from previous sequence-to-sequence neural networks.

Which inductive bias?

Presumably that the output at step (n) is conditioned only the output of step (n-1).

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#120

Builds systems à la carte: Theory and practice https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/c... I've always hated build systems. Stuff cobbled together that barely works, yet a necessary step towards working software. This paper showed me there's hope. If we take build systems seriously, we can come up with something much better than most systems out there.

I’ve loved build and deploy systems. Sure they are complex but when you have a working system, they are quite a joy.
Post reply on HN