Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 197 posts

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#31

One of my favorites is definitely A Unified Framework for Dopamine Signals across Timescales ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.013 ), simply because of its experimental design. They 'teleported' rats in VR to see how their dopamine neurons responded, to determine whether TD learning explains dopamine signals on both short and long timescales. Short answer: it does.

Interesting I'll have to take a look at this paper.

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#32
post #12

The pair of these papers: (Don't read them in full.) 1.Attention is not explanation ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10186 ) 2.Attention is not not Explanation ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.04626 ) Goes to show the complete lack of agreement between researchers in the explainability space. Most popular packages (allen NLP, google LIT, Captum) use saliency based methods (Integrated gradients) or Attention. The community ha…

As a laymen, I don't understand how "attention" and "explanation" are used here. Would you be able to summarize the terms and the contention?

These are deep neural net papers, specifically in NLP.

Explanation: why the model (the deep neural net, that is) is doing what it's doing.

Attention: a particular technique used in certain deep net models, invented a few years ago, that originally showed remarkable performance improvements in NLP (natural language processing) tasks, but has recently been applied in vision and elsewhere.

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#36
Murray S. Davis: "That's Interesting!: Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology" https://proseminarcrossnationalstudies.files.wordpress.com/2...

An interesting (no pun intended) paper on what makes papers (or anything in general) interesting.

Re: Ask HN: What's the best paper you've read in 2020?

#37

For me, it was "Erasure Coding in Windows Azure Storage" from Microsoft Research (2016) [0] The idea that you can achieve the same practical effect of a 3x replication factor in a distributed system, but only increasing the cost of data storage by 1.6x, by leveraging some clever information theory tricks is mind bending to me. If you're operating a large Ceph cluster, or you're Google/Amazon/Microsoft and you're runn…

The paper is from 2012, not 2016 (see https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2342821.2342823)
Post reply on HN