How could you explain me, strictly from the language design point, not practicality/how widespread it is/how easy is to find a job/etc, why JS? What are the strong points which make it a better language than lua/python/lisp/tcl/ruby? Thanks.
A Modern JavaScript Tutorial
161–170 of 299 posts
Re: A Modern JavaScript Tutorial
#162There is a chapter called ‘ninja code’, which is full of terrible advice. A small example. > The ideal name for a variable is data. Use it everywhere you can. There is one small comment at the top of the chapter, which says ‘Irony detected’. Is there really a whole chapter written Ironically? It would be very easy to read this and think it was real advice. (And if it is real advice, and I’m completely misunderstandin…
"A JavaScript Ninja writes code that is brilliantly mysterious. When people read such code it should induce confusion and if at all possible, fear. Clarity is for the feeble. Obviousness is overrated. Obfuscation and secrecy: that is the way of the Ninja. So, how do you become a Ninja?"
Re: A Modern JavaScript Tutorial
#163Re: A Modern JavaScript Tutorial
#164Re: A Modern JavaScript Tutorial
#165Suppose I've been living under a rock this whole time and my knowledge of JS is something along `it's a language you use when you want a message box to appear and annoy your visitors`, i.e. completely out of touch. How could you explain me, strictly from the language design point, not practicality/how widespread it is/how easy is to find a job/etc, why JS? What are the strong points which make it a better language th…
On the server the advantage is much less clear-cut, but a lot of it boils down to “we want to use the same language for the front end and the backend“. Although in my experience this is actually a horrible idea, and tends to result in very messy code and lots of work arounds in practice.
Anyway for me personally I continue to use JavaScript because of a combination of wanting to build lightly-interactive webpages and because that really is what the job market demands. So many companies are dead-set on hiring someone with node, react, and whatever other JavaScript experience. I tried taking it off my resume at one point because I kind of hate it, but if you’re at all involved in full stack web development it’ll really hurt your career if you don’t do JavaScript.
Re: A Modern JavaScript Tutorial
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
>There is one small comment at the top of the chapter, which says ‘Irony detected’. The whole chapter is littered with clearly tongue in cheek remarks.
People will absolutely not get that and take the advice to heart.
Re: A Modern JavaScript Tutorial
#167Intro section has no context, especially how this relates to Crockford's "the good parts".
Is it inspired by it, in conflict with it, a superset, a subset? How did newer standards affect it? how is 'modern' defined? How is 'now' defined?
Re: A Modern JavaScript Tutorial
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
template, file, text
Is file a file object? A file path? All three are “the template”. So, they use polish-ish notation: the template as []byte, template as string, and template as *template.Template.
Re: A Modern JavaScript Tutorial
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a daily user of IntelliJ IDEA—which, IME, has the best autocomplete and code suggestions of any IDE for dynamically typed languages—there is a world of a difference between the quality of suggestions for a codebase using TypeScript and one written in vanilla JS. Without concrete types, the IDE often has to guess the possible type(s) that a value can have, whereas with TS, there is (generally) no such ambiguity.
I don't really experience this issue and I use Web storm which is basically the same thing. I find that the dynamic type hinting plus the combination of using JS Doc formatted comments rarely leaves me with any ambiguity when writing vanilla JavaScript.
Re: A Modern JavaScript Tutorial
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Surely in the end it just adds complexity and fragmentation of the ecosystem? Lol. I switched to TS from pure JS a couple years ago and could never imagine going back. I am so much more productive in TS than JS: 1. Typeahead is crucial, and even when just working on my own projects it makes me much faster. 2. Refactoring is a scary nightmare in pure JS, but so much easier with TS. 3. I have yet to see any sizable,…
I understand the power of types - I just wonder why the heck you are writing so much JS/TS code? Are you doing server stuff with it? You could argue here there are much better languages and platforms for that.
i'm working on a webapp with a scheduling thing and even drawing a nice-but-not-interactive day schedule is a bunch of work. consider a day view that lays out overlapping events next to each other:
Dec 8
-----------
9
10 AAA
11 AAA BBB
12 AAA BBB
13 BBB
14 CCC BBB
15 CCC
16
17 DDDDDDD
18 DDDDDDD
19
like, even laying out those boxes takes a bunch of code. and then you need interactivity, the actual "app" part - you want drag-n-drop that snaps to columns and switches you to another day if you drag it to the side, and selections, and menus, and hovery-popupy things, and undo, and so on... it adds up quickly