Live data from Hacker News

Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

hardware.substack.com

201–210 of 305 posts

Re: Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

#201
post #122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dude you're responding to someone in Belarus. Americans voting for nonsocialist candidates is not the issue there.

Wait what? Googling the user name that I am replying to leads to: https://github.com/baddox San Francisco, CA

Sorry my bad you're correct.

Re: Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

#202
post #187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure but there is no reason to force people not to buy what they want.

What are your talking about? I suggested an alternative, didn't force anyone to do anything.

The thread is about stopping Apple and people being forced to buy Android.

Re: Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

#203
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please don't stop them, I really don't want to be forced to buy an Android phone.

You don't have to: https://puri.sm/products/librem-5

Sure. But I also wouldn't be able to use all the mainstream apps for communication, navigation, etc.

Re: Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

#204
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you feel the same way about anything sold on Amazon? Or in supermarkets? Or is that in some way different?

Just to emphasize your point, 30% take is relatively small in the retail world. A store like Amazon or Walmart or Target or Best Buy generally wants a cut of 40-50%, if not more. And that doesn’t include the cut many distributors want to take for being the middle person. (Source: I’ve been on the executive team at startups with products sold in retail stores)

Yup. And that excludes the fee many brands pay supermarkets to be in the eye level spot on the shelves. New entrants have to spend money just to be visible in the racks, regardless of whether their product is being sold.

Re: Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

#205
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My layman understanding was Epic had to do this to be able to legally challenge Apple in court (to demonstrate damages or whatever). That's not quite the same as (covertly) breaching your contract hoping you get away without getting caught, which is the impression you're giving. Assuming that's accurate, then I'm not sure what else one would expect them to do— not do something that gets them banned, then have their c…

>My layman understanding was Epic had to do this to be able to legally challenge Apple in court This is obviously false because there are other antitrust cases against Apple pending.

It's not obviously false because unless you've read the case law on the legal concept of "standing" you have no insight into the issue at all.

Re: Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

#206
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What are your talking about? I suggested an alternative, didn't force anyone to do anything.

The thread is about stopping Apple and people being forced to buy Android.

Exactly, and I said that we have more than just two choices, i.e., stopping Apple does not force you to buy Android.

Re: Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

#207
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You don't need Big Government to do that. Regulations are there tools that citizens have to reign in corporate behavior. 'Big government' is just a catch name for many anti regulation lobbying entities to remove power from citizens and acumulats it on corporations. > Vote with your wallet. Yes. And also vote with your ballots, one person one vote triumphs one dollar one vote if you want freedom.

> 'Big government' is just a catch name for many anti regulation lobbying entities to remove power from citizens and acumulats it on corporations. This is completely reductionist, and completely uninformed. Banks, as an easy counter example to your worldview, don't have armies of third party regulators, corporate compliance staff, and auditors because they hate regulation. They love big government. It acts as a barri…

+1 for paying attention in Econ 101 (and posting a POV that's probably more controversial these days than it should be).

Re: Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

#208
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The thread is about stopping Apple and people being forced to buy Android.

Exactly, and I said that we have more than just two choices, i.e., stopping Apple does not force you to buy Android.

Yes, but it does force people not to buy what they want.

Adding another alternative doesn’t change that.

Re: Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

#209

I just paid for 12 months worth of Skype subscription which I have used for just 2 calls back in January. I want ALL my subscriptions to go through Apple Pay and App store. Once I subscribed to New York times. The newspaper that was advertised to me for years in all Hollywood movies as a place where honesty and freedom are of highest priority. I had to spend an hour on a phone with their representatives to cancel it…

> Once I subscribed to New York times. The newspaper that was advertised to me for years in all Hollywood movies as a place where honesty and freedom are of highest priority. I had to spend an hour on a phone with their representatives to cancel it refusing to accept discount or a free subscription.

SAME. Somewhere deep in my comment history here, I tell the story of trying to cancel NYT, and needing to do it three times, because I kept getting charged. Ughhhhh.

Re: Falling Out of Love with Apple, Part 3: Content and Censorship

#210
post #186
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's also impossible to use (even for free apps) without IDing yourself, and your travel history (via IP geolocation), to Apple. The convenience comes at a cost.

It’s true that you must identify yourself to download any app from the App Store. But you continue to repeat this outright lie about Apple receiving your travel history. There is no evidence for it, and this has been repeatedly pointed out to you. We know if you opt in to certain services they send an anonymized location. That’s all we know. The part about your travel history being sent is 100% made up by you.

As you have been repeatedly informed, that data is very easy to deanonymize. The last time you were told this, you then made the wacky claim that the data isn't sent to Apple at all. After being shown that it was, you just went on your way only to repeat the original lie again.

I have not seen sneak be repeatedly pointed out that his statement is incorrect. That is a lie. He is completely correct, which is why he has never been corrected.

Post reply on HN