Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anything that’s settled in dollars or dollar-like synthetic instruments will have KYC/AML.
Says who? Who is going to enforce some random African country that is in the middle of a civil war to have those? Also, lots of drug deals are settled in US dollars, they don't have that. So your point that anything settled in dollars will have those laws is way off the mark and easily disproven.
Diem – A rebrand of Facebook’s Libra
91–100 of 425 posts
Re: Diem – A rebrand of Facebook’s Libra
#92Interesting. They went from "Libra" (implying Freedom) to "Diem" (which sounds a lot like Die or Dying).
Re: Diem – A rebrand of Facebook’s Libra
#93Libra was interesting. With their basket of currencies and easily programmable contracts, it was a semi-unique project in crypto space. Over the months, their ambition has been cut a lot by regulators. No more basket of currencies, now just US Dollar. At this point I'm not sure there's any benefit to it being on the blockchain either.
Re: Diem – A rebrand of Facebook’s Libra
#94Article title at the time of this post, in case HN editors change it: > Diem - A rebrand of Facebook Libra Understanding who is behind this is extremely relevant.
Re: Diem – A rebrand of Facebook’s Libra
#95I don't think an interesting cryptocurrency will ever come out of the US , they have the dollar.
I don't find cryptocurrency interesting at all for a free society. I don't see any purpose of it, if you live in a free society. And I do live in one.
Re: Diem – A rebrand of Facebook’s Libra
#96Ok, so let's focus on the underlying idea, without the "Facebook is trying to rebrand their evil brand" cruft. Basically, I think the underlying idea is valuable - low-cost, fast, reliable, accessible money transfers - clearly something missing right now in this world, even for the "global rich" (citizens of first-world countries), let alone for the "unbanked". It could even scale even more to a money store but that'…
I think Zuck's mission wasn't really about empowering the unbanked, but it's: fight WeChat. WeChat already has an effective digital payment system, with the tasty tasty analytics and surveillance capabilities (which yeah, Zuck also probably wants). As to blockchains, that's because this is the hype of the last few years, is it not? As to currencies, IMO the vision of the people hyping bitcoin was that your pizza plac…
It's a term without an accepted definition. A lot of useless branding is expected. Just you wait until IBM gets their hands on .. oh, they already did.
Both the Bitcoin-like zero trust ledger and the m-of-n trusted notaries model have useful use cases. While more descriptive terms would have been great, arguing definitions only goes so far.
Re: Diem – A rebrand of Facebook’s Libra
#97Interesting. They went from "Libra" (implying Freedom) to "Diem" (which sounds a lot like Die or Dying).
Re: Diem – A rebrand of Facebook’s Libra
#98Re: Diem – A rebrand of Facebook’s Libra
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
Avalanche is not the first PoS coin. You could make an argument that the first was Tezos but there are PoS like instruments that predate it significantly.
Looks like Peercoin predates Tezos by about six years (2012 vs 2018): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peercoin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tezos
Re: Diem – A rebrand of Facebook’s Libra
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Says who? Who is going to enforce some random African country that is in the middle of a civil war to have those? Also, lots of drug deals are settled in US dollars, they don't have that. So your point that anything settled in dollars will have those laws is way off the mark and easily disproven.
That's not how finance works. If you don't follow the rules, you get cut off from the rest of the ecosystem which is tightly controlled by the US. So if diem wants to operate at all, they must adhere to the rules regardless of which countries they are operating in.
And other companies are already in this space providing basically the same service.
It seems to me, people applying how companies 1st world countries + the US operate to how companies in 3rd world countries (except the US) have to operate.