This isn't difficult: TVs should not be "smart". TVs should be incredibly dumb. They should be screens for displaying stuff. That's it. Nothing else. No network connection of any kind, no apps, no software beyond that necessary to do basic setup of how that screen works: brightness, input selection, etc.
That would essentially force people to buy two devices - one for receiving content to display and a second to display it. All your solution does is shift the problem on to the receiving device. It wouldn't fix anything, and at the same time it'd increase the cost and complexity for the user (by a very small amount admittedly).
72% of smart TVs and 46% of game consoles hardcode DNS settings
351–360 of 673 posts
Re: 72% of smart TVs and 46% of game consoles hardcode DNS settings
#352Re: 72% of smart TVs and 46% of game consoles hardcode DNS settings
#353This isn't difficult: TVs should not be "smart". TVs should be incredibly dumb. They should be screens for displaying stuff. That's it. Nothing else. No network connection of any kind, no apps, no software beyond that necessary to do basic setup of how that screen works: brightness, input selection, etc.
Can't have you throwing a Heat (1995) DVD without it being recorded in a database, can we? Sure, your smartphone probably pics up the audio, but it may just report that you're listening to Moby.
Re: 72% of smart TVs and 46% of game consoles hardcode DNS settings
#354I’m kind of surprised there isn’t an OpenWRT style project out there to provide a replacement OS for common Smart TVs. At least I couldn’t find one. I’m obviously lacking in understanding the massive difficulties such a project would likely face. But it sure would be very nice to be able to replace my TVs firmware with something open source. I don’t want a dongle or extra box or extra remote. There’s a perfectly good…
Not sure how relevant or up-to-date their support is, but at least there is _something_ :)
Re: 72% of smart TVs and 46% of game consoles hardcode DNS settings
#355Earlier quoted context omitted.
As mentioned in TFA, configuring a firewall to redirect DNS traffic from broken or malicious software is also trivial. Or are you talking about hardcoding IP addresses?
There are plenty of other alternatives. The simplest (but least flexible) would be hardcoding an IP of the final server. Somewhat more sophisticated would be hardcoding an IP to a server with a REST endpoint that returns the real final IP. (Basically just like what DoH does, but without calling it DoH). Even more sophisticated would be hiding the final IP on some kind of public web service like Twitter or Github.
Re: 72% of smart TVs and 46% of game consoles hardcode DNS settings
#356Earlier quoted context omitted.
That would essentially force people to buy two devices - one for receiving content to display and a second to display it. All your solution does is shift the problem on to the receiving device. It wouldn't fix anything, and at the same time it'd increase the cost and complexity for the user (by a very small amount admittedly).
The second device can be as cheap as $17 known as a “Streaming Stick” and treated as a throwaway component.
Re: 72% of smart TVs and 46% of game consoles hardcode DNS settings
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're in luck. Buy a commercial TV, or a hospitality TV. For example: https://www.lg.com/us/business/commercial-tvs/lg-65ut640s0ua Other TV manufacturers make similar products.
Commercial signage tvs tend to be much more expensive and never really go on sale though. I can't even find out the price of this product without calling them to talk to a salesperson?
Re: 72% of smart TVs and 46% of game consoles hardcode DNS settings
#358Earlier quoted context omitted.
> and occasionally just highjack every single query to send you to a page saying you’re approaching your bandwidth quota It boggles my mind it's still a problem in some countries. Last time I saw this kind of notice it was in the nineties, and on a web server, definitely not on a client endpoint. People have had unlimited bandwidth for at least a decade now.
This has regressed. In the NetZero days you would be limited to some hours per month depending on your plan. Then came unlimited cable. And now we are back: my residential AT&T DSL connection is limited to 1TB per month in the Bay Area
https://old.reddit.com/r/homeautomation/comments/k72lzq/sowh...
Re: 72% of smart TVs and 46% of game consoles hardcode DNS settings
#359Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're in luck. Buy a commercial TV, or a hospitality TV. For example: https://www.lg.com/us/business/commercial-tvs/lg-65ut640s0ua Other TV manufacturers make similar products.
Commercial signage tvs tend to be much more expensive and never really go on sale though. I can't even find out the price of this product without calling them to talk to a salesperson?
Of course, there’s also the simple thing of “enterprise stuff costs more for no reason.”
Re: 72% of smart TVs and 46% of game consoles hardcode DNS settings
#360So I expect the device (at least the "smart" functionality) to be bricked as soon as Samsung takes that domain down for good. In fact Samsung already removed 80 % of the gimmicks and remote features the TV came with, some of them didn't even last two years.