Billionaires Build
paulgraham.com
Billionaires Build
1–10 of 957 posts
Re: Billionaires Build
#2Re: Billionaires Build
#3With tens of thousands of people applying to YC every batch, this will probably go down as one of PG’s most popular essays
Re: Billionaires Build
#4I get the retro-appeal this has, but user-friendly it is not.
Re: Billionaires Build
#5Re: Billionaires Build
#6Re: Billionaires Build
#7You don’t. Owning a large company in a capitalist system is inherently exploitative. Simply owning a large company and taking surplus value from a large number of people is exploitation.
Re: Billionaires Build
#8off-topic: I have been actively participating in HN since 2010, and recently I started seeing prominent tech people on twitter backlash against pg. Not sure if It was there before, or if I'm barely noticing this. i.e. many of them show screenshots of getting banned by pg on twitter. https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1329094570056032264
Anyone screenshotting being blocked by anyone is definitely trading in fashion.
Re: Billionaires Build
#9off-topic: I have been actively participating in HN since 2010, and recently I started seeing prominent tech people on twitter backlash against pg. Not sure if It was there before, or if I'm barely noticing this. i.e. many of them show screenshots of getting banned by pg on twitter. https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1329094570056032264
Back then tech was exciting and new. We were changing the world.
Now we have changed the world. Mobile is king, web is emperor. We’ve won.
Tech is to 2020 what finance was to 1980. And VCs are seen as the big baddies.
People don’t join this industry for the love of nerdy tech anymore. They come because it’s where ambitious people go.
Re: Billionaires Build
#10Airbnb spamming forums early on, sketchy marketing techniques, avoiding commercial regulations that hotel has to go through for good reasons and displacing genuine local rent seekers is not exploitative then maybe the bar is high enough for YC.
Should the founder have to think about whether the idea could potentially be exploitative or he just needs to think about what is good for the users aka not exploiting the tourists?