Live data from Hacker News

Tom Swift and His Electric Rifle (2017)

99percentinvisible.org

1–10 of 22 posts

Re: Tom Swift and His Electric Rifle (2017)

#4
post #2

Sure there is no silver bullet, because it's not tasers that taser people....

Just as surely, hit by a taser is 99.9% better outcome than getting a bullet hole in your body.

Are there statistics that show taser use decreased the number of bullets fired/hitting civilians by the police? I find conflicting results. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/police-use-force-impact-... (2011):

A new study suggests that less-lethal weapons decrease rates of officer and offender injuries

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/18/theres-no-evidence-tasers-re... (2018):

“We find no substitutions between Tasers and firearms,” Professor Jeffrey Grogger told CNBC. The study reviewed 36,112 use-of-force incidents in Chicago

Re: Tom Swift and His Electric Rifle (2017)

#6
post #2

Sure there is no silver bullet, because it's not tasers that taser people....

Just as surely, hit by a taser is 99.9% better outcome than getting a bullet hole in your body.

Tasers do still kill people. And the threshold to using them is a lot lower than a gun.

Re: Tom Swift and His Electric Rifle (2017)

#7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just as surely, hit by a taser is 99.9% better outcome than getting a bullet hole in your body.

Tasers do still kill people. And the threshold to using them is a lot lower than a gun.

any physical altercation carries the risk of death or serious injury. do tasers have an especially bad risk vs. use threshold?

Re: Tom Swift and His Electric Rifle (2017)

#9
post #5

The lesser of two evils is still evil. We don't need kinder weapons. We need a way to stop using weapons so much. Thinly veiled advertisements for Axon (makers of Taser!) only exploit concerns and don't fix the real problems.

Imagine living in a world with no bad actors or mentally unstable people
Post reply on HN