The new “contrarian” religious belief that many thought leaders are now writing about. Is this a trend with high value that some people are getting huge gains for themselves from? I think so. Alternatively is it an echo chamber of high status people signalling just how contrarian they are? I suspect that some trend victims do this. However I think Sam Altman is just reflecting his thoughts in an essay to help him exp…
The Strength of Being Misunderstood
41–50 of 59 posts
Re: The Strength of Being Misunderstood
#42I feel like the strength of being misunderstood is more like the strength of being correct. Just because other people don't understand you doesn't mean you are correct. If you aren't correct, this post will do nothing for you but make you bull-headed and closed off to criticism.
It seems pretty obvious that it's profitable (to one's wallet as well as ego) to be right when everyone else is wrong.
Re: The Strength of Being Misunderstood
#43Being misunderstood is a great temporary moat. I could write a book on this, but suffice it to say, I didn't have confidence in my own vision until I took the time to really look at others and realized that the main difference between me and the average idiot was that I had bothered to look at the ideas of other idiots at all. It was like their entire ontology had become an ant farm. It was the moment I realized, I a…
Re: The Strength of Being Misunderstood
#44Re: The Strength of Being Misunderstood
#45Being misunderstood is a great temporary moat. I could write a book on this, but suffice it to say, I didn't have confidence in my own vision until I took the time to really look at others and realized that the main difference between me and the average idiot was that I had bothered to look at the ideas of other idiots at all. It was like their entire ontology had become an ant farm. It was the moment I realized, I a…
Re: The Strength of Being Misunderstood
#46I don't understand what the strength of being misunderstood is.
Re: The Strength of Being Misunderstood
#47Format of a techno-optimist essay. Formulate a common neurosis that people are self conscious about. State common knowledge about this neurosis. State that the common knowledge is an oversimplification. Break the problem into a graph on two axes. Bonus points if you help people think they are avoiding identity politics in some way with this new knowledge.
I wonder what we get if we feed enough essays like these into GPT-3. Enough self help books to make a living, I suppose.