Live data from Hacker News

AWS Lambda pricing now per ms

aws.amazon.com

1–10 of 291 posts

Re: AWS Lambda pricing now per ms

#5
I've learned that AWS pricing tends to improve over time, and I appreciate it. I just recently switched from a startup offering authorization to AWS Cognito because the startup kept raising their price(s).

It's nice to see this drop, though I'm sure Amazon does it due to competition as well.

Re: AWS Lambda pricing now per ms

#7

For reference - Lambda functions used to billed at 100ms intervals. My Node.Js function usually only takes 37-40ms to run. So this is a pretty good advancement for cost savings.

> So this is a pretty good advancement for cost savings.

For some people. Those cost savings are made up somewhere else. Ultimately, Amazon is not a loss leader.

Re: AWS Lambda pricing now per ms

#8

For reference - Lambda functions used to billed at 100ms intervals. My Node.Js function usually only takes 37-40ms to run. So this is a pretty good advancement for cost savings.

> So this is a pretty good advancement for cost savings. For some people. Those cost savings are made up somewhere else. Ultimately, Amazon is not a loss leader.

Why only for some people? It always rounded up to 100ms. If your function took 101ms, it was billed as 200ms.

Re: AWS Lambda pricing now per ms

#9

For reference - Lambda functions used to billed at 100ms intervals. My Node.Js function usually only takes 37-40ms to run. So this is a pretty good advancement for cost savings.

> So this is a pretty good advancement for cost savings. For some people. Those cost savings are made up somewhere else. Ultimately, Amazon is not a loss leader.

… yes? I don't use AWS Lambda at all, so I don't see any cost savings. It's implicit that not everyone will see the savings.
Post reply on HN