Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm seeing this: > This is not available to you
That's a common Twitter bug, just try again a few times.
I Made a Self-Quoting Tweet
31–40 of 145 posts
Re: I Made a Self-Quoting Tweet
#32> And for anyone at Twitter who was depending on the network of tweets being a Directed Acyclic Graph, I'm so terribly sorry. I love the idea that there's someone out there with code that resolves retweet chains recursively, who's about to be in for a great head scratcher of a bug.
They will have to reckon with the fifty thousand-long chain at https://twitter.com/every_peano
Re: I Made a Self-Quoting Tweet
#33Re: I Made a Self-Quoting Tweet
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a common Twitter bug, just try again a few times.
Nope, I'm assuming that's someone on Twitter noticing what he did and hiding it.
"This is not available to you." is something different from "This Tweet is unavailable."
Re: I Made a Self-Quoting Tweet
#35[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleene%27s_recursion_theorem
Re: I Made a Self-Quoting Tweet
#36I made two mutual-quoting tweets that run the toad oscillator from the Game of Life https://twitter.com/mauritscorneIis/status/12668346972560875...
Do you think a 3-cycle is doable?
Re: I Made a Self-Quoting Tweet
#37Re: I Made a Self-Quoting Tweet
#38Re: I Made a Self-Quoting Tweet
#39FWIW, I also did this back in 2019: https://twitter.com/nneonneo/status/1177641328705851392?lang... I don't know of a better way to do this other than some analysis of the IDs + clever bruteforce. If I remember correctly, I used just over 500 tweets to do it.
Re: I Made a Self-Quoting Tweet
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Recursion isn't the problem. Not keeping track of seen tweets is the problem. Recursion can be used to detect cycles and traverse a cyclic graph in a way that doesn't blow up.
But you wouldn’t do that if your assumption is that the graph doesn’t cycle. Edit: child comments are correct and I regret my oversight