Earlier quoted context omitted.
Clickables: http://www.ck12.org/flexbook/ http://www.flatworldknowledge.com/
That's one lame "Javascript is off" warning, on the former. Degrade gracefully, and let the client see something of what you have to offer. They might actually decide it's worth their while, and gather sufficient trust, to enable Javascript.
Open Education Resources
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: Open Education Resources
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's one lame "Javascript is off" warning, on the former. Degrade gracefully, and let the client see something of what you have to offer. They might actually decide it's worth their while, and gather sufficient trust, to enable Javascript.
I understand the complaint completely, but be sure to look at it from a cost/benefit viewpoint as well. People with JS off are likely significantly less than 1% of their users. They would likely benefit more from supporting IE6, and maybe IE5, than supporting JS-off.
I keep JS disabled because there's just too much random/nasty cr*p out there. I'll do JS for some sites, but it's definitely "opt-in", for me.
Yeah, I'm a corner case. I just found the deliberate redirect away from a presentable page (with JS disabled) to a content-devoid warning/advisory, to be rather pointless, from my perspective.
Re: Open Education Resources
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
I understand the complaint completely, but be sure to look at it from a cost/benefit viewpoint as well. People with JS off are likely significantly less than 1% of their users. They would likely benefit more from supporting IE6, and maybe IE5, than supporting JS-off.
It's a redirect to a warning page. If you pause the load (Escape key) before the redirect, the initial/front page is plenty visible and ok looking. I keep JS disabled because there's just too much random/nasty cr*p out there. I'll do JS for some sites, but it's definitely "opt-in", for me. Yeah, I'm a corner case. I just found the deliberate redirect away from a presentable page (with JS disabled) to a content-devoid…
Re: Open Education Resources
#14I can't believe they didn't mention Khan Academy.
Re: Open Education Resources
#15http://www.reddit.com/r/csbooks
http://www.reddit.com/r/mathbooks
http://www.reddit.com/r/eebooks
http://www.reddit.com/r/physicsbooks
http://www.reddit.com/r/econbooks
And, of course, there is this classic site:
http://people.math.gatech.edu/~cain/textbooks/onlinebooks.ht...
Re: Open Education Resources
#16I can't believe they didn't mention Khan Academy.
They do, first link in the 4th paragraph. Noticed now that Academic Earth ( http://academicearth.org/ ) is missing, tho.
Re: Open Education Resources
#17I have to admit an interest in this as I work for them, but the Open University ( http://www.open.ac.uk/ ) do have quite a lot of material online.... http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/ http://open.edu/itunes/ http://www.youtube.com/user/oulearn
minor grumble: why, why, WHY do so many universities put their content on ItunesU, thus making it all but inaccessible for those of us not already using apple software.
Even dumping a pile of MP3s on a server somewhere would make your material much more accessible.
Re: Open Education Resources
#18I have to admit an interest in this as I work for them, but the Open University ( http://www.open.ac.uk/ ) do have quite a lot of material online.... http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/ http://open.edu/itunes/ http://www.youtube.com/user/oulearn
That is a lot of material. Thanks. minor grumble: why, why, WHY do so many universities put their content on ItunesU, thus making it all but inaccessible for those of us not already using apple software. Even dumping a pile of MP3s on a server somewhere would make your material much more accessible.
Re: Open Education Resources
#19I have to admit an interest in this as I work for them, but the Open University ( http://www.open.ac.uk/ ) do have quite a lot of material online.... http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/ http://open.edu/itunes/ http://www.youtube.com/user/oulearn
That is a lot of material. Thanks. minor grumble: why, why, WHY do so many universities put their content on ItunesU, thus making it all but inaccessible for those of us not already using apple software. Even dumping a pile of MP3s on a server somewhere would make your material much more accessible.
The actual content is in fact still stored on the school's server, just as you say -- a very common way of populating iTunes U is through RSS feeds from some internal system (not necessarily Apple-based).
If the content is free, there's no reason why they shouldn't make it available through alternate links/feeds. You could try complaining to the person in charge. :-)
Re: Open Education Resources
#20I can't believe they didn't mention Khan Academy.
A high school student I know finds the Khan videos not deep enough. She said they are a good introduction but didn't cover anywhere near what she was seeing in class. So I guess you get what you pay for.
It's just that he chooses areas to cover based on feedback from students/users - and if enough students approach him, the subject gets magically covered.