Rate/Review my startup - mixturtle
71–80 of 90 posts
Re: Rate/Review my startup - mixturtle
#72Re: Rate/Review my startup - mixturtle
#73It's pretty good - one of the better music index services I've used. Others here have commented on a few small issues but overall it seems well executed. However, is this really a viable business? I assume you intend it to be, based upon your description of it being a startup, but please correct me if I'm mistaken. Otherwise, I'm afraid I'm going to have to piss on your parade a little bit. I have considered developi…
You could have made the same case to the founders of Youtube. If everyone listens to arguments like that, then the RIAA has already won.
Re: Rate/Review my startup - mixturtle
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't downmod, but I don't agree that everything that can work without JS should gracefully degrade. That seems like a lot of extra work to support a miniscule segment of fussy purists. What am I not getting?
Well, JS is turing-complete and that's both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing because you can do "anything", but it's a curse because unconstrained code is opaque. It's very hard to do stuff like extracting the semantics (what you meant to express when you wrote the code) out of JS and doing things like transformations without an unreasonable amount of work. I think it's better to express as much as you can in…
I'm partly kidding. I might use that design style under some circumstances. I disagree that it's the right way to do things. There are many ways to do things. I think people want a "right" way because they want to feel like they've got stuff figured out. (This is especially common in our world because software is complex and there's a lot of uncertainty around how to do it well.)
As it happens, the app I'm currently working on is as far away from this design style as you can get. We do almost everything in JS, even things that could easily be done in HTML and CSS. Our way of carving things up relies heavily on expressing everything in a single language, and the Turing-completeness of said language is an advantage not a disadvantage. It's a solution I'm fond of because it neatly combines high-level abstraction at the source level with some stringent performance requirements in the browser. It will also be fun to watch the purists turn green when they see it.
Edit: we do almost everything in generated JS. Might be relevant.
Re: Rate/Review my startup - mixturtle
#75Re: Rate/Review my startup - mixturtle
#76It's pretty good - one of the better music index services I've used. Others here have commented on a few small issues but overall it seems well executed. However, is this really a viable business? I assume you intend it to be, based upon your description of it being a startup, but please correct me if I'm mistaken. Otherwise, I'm afraid I'm going to have to piss on your parade a little bit. I have considered developi…
Hopefully these initiatives will be the 'death by a 1000 cuts' of the RIAA.
I'd like to see a single global licensing body with a harmonised and simplified model covering every component; record labels, publishers, performers, writers, download rights, artwork, etc. There could be ways for them to support small broadcasters - by providing access to a large catalogue of digital music, waiving fees in exchange for delivering ads, etc. From this we'd see some really innovative services bubbling up to the top.
However, I still stand behind what I said - if you want to turn a service like mixturtle into a viable business then you have to play their game, which is very difficult. I know it makes me unpopular, but it's just a reality we have to live with (for now).
I had discussions with PPL and MCPS-PRS here in the UK a long time ago - their model is pretty complex - and if I wanted to have users in other countries then I'd need to get licensed with their representative bodies too. Not to mention the issue of download rights and artwork - all that has to be negotiated directly with the copyright holders. I'd wanted to build an ad-based model, but in the end I couldn't see any alternative to subscriptions, so I gave up - I couldn't afford the £10,000 advance fee.
Re: Rate/Review my startup - mixturtle
#77It's pretty good - one of the better music index services I've used. Others here have commented on a few small issues but overall it seems well executed. However, is this really a viable business? I assume you intend it to be, based upon your description of it being a startup, but please correct me if I'm mistaken. Otherwise, I'm afraid I'm going to have to piss on your parade a little bit. I have considered developi…
You could have made the same case to the founders of Youtube. If everyone listens to arguments like that, then the RIAA has already won.