Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the challenge will be persuading courts that actions that users are paid to undertake in public and contractually agreed to reassign relevant image rights to are [i] 'personal data' under the intended meaning of GDPR and that [ii] something they didn't have informed consent about the possibility third parties might have access to when signing those contracts. Proving actual instances of harm suffered from the…
>Proving actual instances of harm suffered from the dissemination of unfavourable statistics is also going to be tricky (even though there are undoubtedly players that have lost out). All you would need is one club saying they searched the data for say "any player over six foot" and one player who fit the search term but the data was inaccurate.
Players to sue for hundreds of millions over use of their statistics
31–40 of 99 posts
Re: Players to sue for hundreds of millions over use of their statistics
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think another argument is that the game is enjoyed in many forms, over radio, over television, streamed over the internet - and all of those rights must be purchased, etc. If the game statistics are another form of enjoyment, then it is another form, and should be subject to the same ownership issues as the other channels. OTOH, I think the argument is very weak. First, precedent is strongly against the players her…
> Player stats have never been licensed to my knowledge. Of course they are, that's the entire business model of data analytics companies - the customers are: - clubs and national teams themselves (e.g. German national team coaches Klinsmann and Löw were famous for early adopting data-driven training) - sports betting services, casinos and similar enterprises - TV and radio stations so that the commenters can (at an…
Re: Players to sue for hundreds of millions over use of their statistics
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't have access to the article but they'll surely be suing on GDPR grounds, for unpermissioned use of personal data, not the copyright (which, I agree, they probably won't hold). It's akin to an employer now tracking 24/7 whether you are sat at your home office desk (in my view: this shouldn't be allowed, with or without permission).
These are football players playing matches in public and the statistics are trivial I imagine, like how many passes they make and stuff like that, no? This seems like they just want free money and I hope they lose
Re: Players to sue for hundreds of millions over use of their statistics
#34If I sit at a busy intersection and count the cars going by in a 5 minute span, do I owe something to each of those drivers.
IANAL, but this is just ridiculous.
Re: Players to sue for hundreds of millions over use of their statistics
#35I'm not a lawyer, and I'm especially not a British lawyer, but I do have an Athletic subscription. The article discusses a lawsuit on behalf of Primer League and mostly lower league soccer players in England around their "personal data." > More than 400 current and former players have signed up to pursue gaming, betting and data-processing companies who utilise their personal statistics without consent or compensatio…
I think another argument is that the game is enjoyed in many forms, over radio, over television, streamed over the internet - and all of those rights must be purchased, etc. If the game statistics are another form of enjoyment, then it is another form, and should be subject to the same ownership issues as the other channels. OTOH, I think the argument is very weak. First, precedent is strongly against the players her…
this have been tried for Chess, and deemed not applicable. Others are allowed to do live coverage of the moves without purchasing any rights. The organizers control the live footage, can ban them from entering the premises to interview players etc., so most will adhere to some form of contract. But if you have no ties there's nothing stopping you from making your own content based on purely the moves being made.
Update: Specifically, the moves are not copyrightable https://chess24.com/en/read/news/us-judge-agrees-with-chess2...
It also mentions "NBA vs. Motorola" in which NBA didn't own statistics of NBA games and others were allowed to use them.
Re: Players to sue for hundreds of millions over use of their statistics
#36Re: Players to sue for hundreds of millions over use of their statistics
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think betting is likely to have an unusually negative economic impact on the players. Loss avoidance means people are more likely to remember players ‘underperforming’ expectations than exceeding them. That’s going to have a negative impact on their marketability as paid sponsors independent of actual performance. It’s questionable if they can win, but demonstrating damages may be the easiest part of this case.
I think proving a specific instance of lost sponsorship income to the satisfaction of a court is going to be extraordinarily difficult, especially if the argument is that consumers draw more adverse inferences from commercial datasets (which they generally don't have access to themselves; betting companies use them to help set the odds) than watching the matches. Even more so when the context is that virtually any em…
It’s the same basic principle as speeding or drunk driving being illegal even if nobody was actually harmed, putting people at significant risk of harm is not acceptable.
Re: Players to sue for hundreds of millions over use of their statistics
#38It's no more "their" statistic than the sentence "Neil Armstrong was the first man on the moon" belongs to Neil Armstrong. If I sit at a busy intersection and count the cars going by in a 5 minute span, do I owe something to each of those drivers. IANAL, but this is just ridiculous.
Hard for me to believe that personal statistics aren't like that. Meet all the GDPR conditions.
Re: Players to sue for hundreds of millions over use of their statistics
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't have access to the article but they'll surely be suing on GDPR grounds, for unpermissioned use of personal data, not the copyright (which, I agree, they probably won't hold). It's akin to an employer now tracking 24/7 whether you are sat at your home office desk (in my view: this shouldn't be allowed, with or without permission).
These are football players playing matches in public and the statistics are trivial I imagine, like how many passes they make and stuff like that, no? This seems like they just want free money and I hope they lose
Personal data doesn't just stop being personal data because it's someone else's.
Re: Players to sue for hundreds of millions over use of their statistics
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think another argument is that the game is enjoyed in many forms, over radio, over television, streamed over the internet - and all of those rights must be purchased, etc. If the game statistics are another form of enjoyment, then it is another form, and should be subject to the same ownership issues as the other channels. OTOH, I think the argument is very weak. First, precedent is strongly against the players her…
> and all of those rights must be purchased this have been tried for Chess, and deemed not applicable. Others are allowed to do live coverage of the moves without purchasing any rights. The organizers control the live footage, can ban them from entering the premises to interview players etc., so most will adhere to some form of contract. But if you have no ties there's nothing stopping you from making your own conten…