Live data from Hacker News

MacBook Air M1 review: Windows laptops are so screwed

inputmag.com

1–5 of 5 posts

Re: MacBook Air M1 review: Windows laptops are so screwed

#4
At the best of times I've found HN's Apple bias ridiculous but with the increasing frequency of submissions like this it's looking more and more like a shilling field.

This is a poorly written ad and nothing more. Please HN, we can do better than this. Mods?

Re: MacBook Air M1 review: Windows laptops are so screwed

#5
post #2

I am suspicious of this article as it seems to conflate hardware with OS. Is it Windows laptops that are screwed, or Intel laptops, or x86 laptops? Seems like a poorly structured argument to me. What about Linux laptops? Are they screwed too? yawn

The title is "Windows laptops", so it isn't making an argument for or against FreeBSD, Linux, Haiku or other laptop OSes.

It's "Windows laptops", more directly those on Intel, but those on ARM are mentioned too. Here's the relevant text:

"""Windows laptops won’t be able to come close to this kind of battery life without either switching to ARM chips or doubling their physical battery capacity. And even if Windows laptops switch to ARM chips, Windows 10 just isn’t very good on ARM architecture.""" The last clause links to another article in the same site reviewing the Microsoft Surface Pro X, with a 3GHz SQ1 ARM-based CPU.

Now, it's possible that Windows-on-AMD laptops are not screwed, as they aren't mentioned. But that's a rather minor objection compared to your, IMO, misdirected broadside.