Live data from Hacker News

Libgen Storage Decentralization on IPFS

freeread.org

21–30 of 115 posts

Re: Libgen Storage Decentralization on IPFS

#21

The IPFS mirror really gives a substantial performance boost. In the past, the files had to be fetched from a tired server far away in Russia, the speed can be as low as 0.5 Mbps in my experience (depends on your ISP and connectivity), now it can be lightning fast thanks to P2P, 2 Mbps+, more than adequate to download a 100 MiB+ file. You don't even have to install IPFS (but you probably should, to maintain decentral…

In my experience IPFS is only fast when you're using it through something like Cloudflare's IPFS proxy (which is basically a caching proxy). I haven't found IPFS to be actually usable any time I've tried running a node myself. Is that unusual?

No.

The last time I tried it (maybe 9-12 months ago) it was a real resource hog (including choking the network) and really slow.

Re: Libgen Storage Decentralization on IPFS

#23

A strange choice given that distributing copyrighted materials violates the IPFS Code of Conduct [0]. Why not use BitTorrent whose attitude toward copyright is much more in sync with libgen's? [0] https://github.com/ipfs/community/blob/master/code-of-conduc...

Ah, thanks for mentioning that. If I understand well, it's a distributed filesystem but there is still an authority able to ban users or contents?

Re: Libgen Storage Decentralization on IPFS

#24

A strange choice given that distributing copyrighted materials violates the IPFS Code of Conduct [0]. Why not use BitTorrent whose attitude toward copyright is much more in sync with libgen's? [0] https://github.com/ipfs/community/blob/master/code-of-conduc...

Protocols don't have attitudes, everything you're using IPFS for you could also use BitTorrent for (almost). The protocols don't really care about what data you send, and no one can stop you from using them, BT or IPFS.

The CoC you've linked covers the IPFS Community and other Protocol Labs initiatives, it doesn't cover usage of IPFS itself. freeread.org is not bound by that CoC.

Re: Libgen Storage Decentralization on IPFS

#25
post #23

A strange choice given that distributing copyrighted materials violates the IPFS Code of Conduct [0]. Why not use BitTorrent whose attitude toward copyright is much more in sync with libgen's? [0] https://github.com/ipfs/community/blob/master/code-of-conduc...

Ah, thanks for mentioning that. If I understand well, it's a distributed filesystem but there is still an authority able to ban users or contents?

The answer for both BitTorrent and IPFS is: No.

Re: Libgen Storage Decentralization on IPFS

#26

The IPFS mirror really gives a substantial performance boost. In the past, the files had to be fetched from a tired server far away in Russia, the speed can be as low as 0.5 Mbps in my experience (depends on your ISP and connectivity), now it can be lightning fast thanks to P2P, 2 Mbps+, more than adequate to download a 100 MiB+ file. You don't even have to install IPFS (but you probably should, to maintain decentral…

> send a list of IP addresses to Prentice Hall or Elsevier

I don’t know, do you think nobody has noticed LibGen by now? Do you think the reason they’re still running is because of some jurisdiction issue? Even the lawyers would be wrong on that one.

Re: Libgen Storage Decentralization on IPFS

#28

A strange choice given that distributing copyrighted materials violates the IPFS Code of Conduct [0]. Why not use BitTorrent whose attitude toward copyright is much more in sync with libgen's? [0] https://github.com/ipfs/community/blob/master/code-of-conduc...

Yeah, and the fact that they've already decided to blacklist sci-hub.

https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/mirror-of-sci-hub-in-ipfs/1613

Re: Libgen Storage Decentralization on IPFS

#29

I'm hesitant to participate in IPFS in the context of libgen. Torrenting copyrighted materials (especially if you are distributing) can be quite expensive in some jurisdictions and I do not believe that IPFS is treated different than regular BitTorrent.

> Torrenting copyrighted materials (especially if you are distributing) can be quite expensive in some jurisdictions

Why? Your ISP charges for BitTorrent traffic?

Re: Libgen Storage Decentralization on IPFS

#30
post #24

A strange choice given that distributing copyrighted materials violates the IPFS Code of Conduct [0]. Why not use BitTorrent whose attitude toward copyright is much more in sync with libgen's? [0] https://github.com/ipfs/community/blob/master/code-of-conduc...

Protocols don't have attitudes, everything you're using IPFS for you could also use BitTorrent for (almost). The protocols don't really care about what data you send, and no one can stop you from using them, BT or IPFS. The CoC you've linked covers the IPFS Community and other Protocol Labs initiatives, it doesn't cover usage of IPFS itself. freeread.org is not bound by that CoC.

The protocol can't, but the network can.

https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/mirror-of-sci-hub-in-ipfs/1613

Post reply on HN