Live data from Hacker News

HuffPost India is history, thanks to new FDI norms

newslaundry.com

21–30 of 135 posts

Re: HuffPost India is history, thanks to new FDI norms

#21
post #2

Doesn’t seem so crazy that they don’t want some foreign media mogul to influence their country.

I believe Rupert Murdoch, who is Australian became a US citizen to take ownership of US television stations. He seems to have a significant influence here (as well as Europe and Asia). So crazy enough for established procedures.

Re: HuffPost India is history, thanks to new FDI norms

#22

If I had to fund a media organisation in a foreign country which only runs losses. Either I am a philanthropist or more likely have a sinister motive. Several foreign dictatorships are heavily invested in controlling the media narrative in India. This was perhaps triggered by the war with China. India's liberal foreign ownership gives China a one way strategic advantage.

But unfortuanately(as a side effect?) policies like this hinders the operations of goodwill nonprofits like Amnesty International[1].

[1]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/29/amnesty-to-hal...

Re: HuffPost India is history, thanks to new FDI norms

#23

Huffpost.in was not at all a popular media outlet. I doubt it had any significant revenue. At some point, fundamentals of the business matter.

> I doubt it had any significant revenue.

We don't know, and what's significant? Return on investment regardless of size of investment is significant when running any business.

> At some point, fundamentals of the business matter.

I think the fundamental outlined in the article is "Narendra Modi government’s new foreign direct investment norms for digital media," and not described in relation to revenue.

Re: HuffPost India is history, thanks to new FDI norms

#24
post #2

Doesn’t seem so crazy that they don’t want some foreign media mogul to influence their country.

It is crazy because in India political parties can indirectly accept foreign funding through a recent change in constitution by ruling party.

Foreign funding of political parties is equally if not more dangerous than foreign funding of news media.

Re: HuffPost India is history, thanks to new FDI norms

#25
post #20

Whether HuffPost was popular in India is besides the point. To provide some contrast, the same govt amended a law originally designed to prohibit foreign funding of political parties and changed it to allow funding from local companies which have more than 50% foreign ownership. So basically political parties can indirectly accept foreign funds through above loophole which the ruling party itself created but news org…

and interestingly, HuffPost India was the exclusive publisher of the Electoral Bonds series. here's a compilation of the entire series https://www.reddit.com/r/india/comments/ew07en/compilation_o...

Re: HuffPost India is history, thanks to new FDI norms

#28
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HuffPost is centre-right at best, what are you on about? If you want an example of left, look at the https://morningstaronline.co.uk

Ground News marks HuffPo as living solidly on the Left: https://ground.news/interest/25781bef-fab9-4951-8bff-5926d11...

Thanks for this! Ground News has a handy bias checker add-on! Was searching for something like this.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ground-news-b...

Re: HuffPost India is history, thanks to new FDI norms

#30
post #24
post #2

Doesn’t seem so crazy that they don’t want some foreign media mogul to influence their country.

It is crazy because in India political parties can indirectly accept foreign funding through a recent change in constitution by ruling party. Foreign funding of political parties is equally if not more dangerous than foreign funding of news media.

Also these donations are anonymous (to the public) so it's even more egregious that the opposition leaders have not managed to make this into a larger issue (maybe it benefits all parties?).
Post reply on HN