Live data from Hacker News

You might not need machine learning

nullprogram.com

1–10 of 201 posts

Re: You might not need machine learning

#3

While true I don't think this driving problem is used as an example for something you should use ML for rather an example to show how you could apply it.

Nevertheless, it is impossible to say why a 'neural network' would be better than some other model function with a large number of parameters. It's true, there are some significant successes achieved with NNs, but there is not a lot of work separating necessities from contingencies. Basically, a lot of it is trial and error.

Re: You might not need machine learning

#6
I think links like this are really helpful. Too often I suffer from the (common on HN) mindset of, "I know nothing about this field, but I'm intelligent enough to know this is stupid". Posts like this are not only interesting, but give me a small dose of humility.

Re: You might not need machine learning

#10

I think links like this are really helpful. Too often I suffer from the (common on HN) mindset of, "I know nothing about this field, but I'm intelligent enough to know this is stupid". Posts like this are not only interesting, but give me a small dose of humility.

Where have I heard that before?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25196754

Post reply on HN