“Microsoft Pluton Hardware Security Coming to Our CPUs”: AMD, Intel, Qualcomm
21–30 of 172 posts
Re: “Microsoft Pluton Hardware Security Coming to Our CPUs”: AMD, Intel, Qualcomm
#22I worked extensively with Pluton when I was employed on Azure Sphere (an IoT platform marketed as highly secure and composed of a linux-based OS, ARM SoC, and cloud service). I might be able to answer questions about this. Here’s a blog by the engineer lead on Azure Sphere that discusses Pluton: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/anatomy-of-a-secured-... Disclaimer: I still work at MSFT but in a different org.
The pressing concern for me: what does this mean for non-Windows operating systems running on Pluton-equipped systems? Will there be a possibility for non-Windows software to use Pluton's features?
From a technical standpoint, Azure Sphere's OS was built on Linux. As far as I know, there isn't anything Windows specific to Pluton. Pluton was a separate (heavily-modified) ARM M4 core which we interfaced with from the main A7 core via a secure mailbox channel, which was again OS agnostic.
Re: “Microsoft Pluton Hardware Security Coming to Our CPUs”: AMD, Intel, Qualcomm
#23I worked extensively with Pluton when I was employed on Azure Sphere (an IoT platform marketed as highly secure and composed of a linux-based OS, ARM SoC, and cloud service). I might be able to answer questions about this. Here’s a blog by the engineer lead on Azure Sphere that discusses Pluton: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/anatomy-of-a-secured-... Disclaimer: I still work at MSFT but in a different org.
Re: “Microsoft Pluton Hardware Security Coming to Our CPUs”: AMD, Intel, Qualcomm
#24A previous HN link is here -- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25131431 -- which links to MS's original press release -- https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2020/11/17/meet-the-... . That article explicitly states that it was designed originally for the xbox. I worry that going to be a very anti-consumer, anti-free-speech, DRM heavy chip that MS want to popularise as an alternative to the (still hated in some…
Re: “Microsoft Pluton Hardware Security Coming to Our CPUs”: AMD, Intel, Qualcomm
#25> What the Pluton project from Microsoft and the agreement between AMD, Intel, and Qualcomm will do is build a TPM-equivalent directly into the silicon of every Windows-based PC of the future. CPUs with security modules controlled by MS? Who will guarantee it won't be abused against non MS systems and users?
How many Qualcomm CPUs run Windows?
Re: “Microsoft Pluton Hardware Security Coming to Our CPUs”: AMD, Intel, Qualcomm
#26Call me sceptical, but I hope m$ is not pulling Apple tricks to lock computers to their OS. Is this open source? Will consumer be able to audit it down to the silicon level?
With regards to the auditing need, can you audit a CPU down to the silicon level today?
Re: “Microsoft Pluton Hardware Security Coming to Our CPUs”: AMD, Intel, Qualcomm
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it a policy question without Pluton? I.e. will this allow hardware vendors additional means to prevent me from installing Linux?
> will this allow hardware vendors additional means to prevent me from installing Linux? No. Pluton serves as an on-chip secure enclave for encryption keys and the like. This is unrelated to installing operating systems.
EDIT: s/access/r\/w & to the contents of/
Re: “Microsoft Pluton Hardware Security Coming to Our CPUs”: AMD, Intel, Qualcomm
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
If Qualcomm is implementing it, I'm sure it will on a technical level. Linux is important to AMD and Intel, but Linux-running devices represent nearly all of Qualcomm's non-embedded SOC market. Whether vendors can use it to restrict such things, I don't think anyone can say right now, but I would guess and hope not. The TPM does not.
If Qualcomm is implementing it then it should be easy enough to break. Qualcomm's secure enclave software for Android has had an absolutely abysmal security track record. Apple gets all the press precisely because it's such an achievement (well, that and Apple is more well known). Qualcomm hacks have come out like every 6 months for nearly a decade, and nobody cares anymore.
well at least it needs physical access.
Re: “Microsoft Pluton Hardware Security Coming to Our CPUs”: AMD, Intel, Qualcomm
#29Call me sceptical, but I hope m$ is not pulling Apple tricks to lock computers to their OS. Is this open source? Will consumer be able to audit it down to the silicon level?
Re: “Microsoft Pluton Hardware Security Coming to Our CPUs”: AMD, Intel, Qualcomm
#30I worked extensively with Pluton when I was employed on Azure Sphere (an IoT platform marketed as highly secure and composed of a linux-based OS, ARM SoC, and cloud service). I might be able to answer questions about this. Here’s a blog by the engineer lead on Azure Sphere that discusses Pluton: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/anatomy-of-a-secured-... Disclaimer: I still work at MSFT but in a different org.