Earlier quoted context omitted.
Vitamin D can be bought without prescription and there is currently no shortage, so why should a country (government) distribute it? Anyone who wants some can buy some. Handing out free Vitamin D is like handing out free gym passes. It's not bad, but also not really a government's responsibility except for cases when people would benefit a lot but could not afford it at all.
Same reason governments filter the water or remove lead from paint; just because knowledge is available doesn't mean all citizens can and will act on it, and sometimes lowering the barrier is all that's needed. Moreover, I'd argue older generations in particular are more susceptible to believing what the doctor says. Just having the research available and the vitamins on the shelf isn't going to have nearly the same…
Vitamin D improves survival in Covid-19 elderly patients
31–40 of 112 posts
Re: Vitamin D improves survival in Covid-19 elderly patients
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same reason governments filter the water or remove lead from paint; just because knowledge is available doesn't mean all citizens can and will act on it, and sometimes lowering the barrier is all that's needed. Moreover, I'd argue older generations in particular are more susceptible to believing what the doctor says. Just having the research available and the vitamins on the shelf isn't going to have nearly the same…
Vitamin D is the only supplement that the NHS suggests that most people should take as a matter of course. But the logistics of getting it out to everyone would be tough. Easier to recommend it and let people buy it.
Re: Vitamin D improves survival in Covid-19 elderly patients
#33I am curious to know why countries didn't buy large quantities of vitamin D and distribute them to all people? Wouldn't that be cheaper and more effective than complete lockdowns, full hospitals, etc.?
In a similar instance where one country (the United States) realized that distributing a specific medicine widely to all citizens would vastly improve public health, they discovered that — just as with anti-vaxxers/maskers — people will attribute medical issues that are outside of their control and have no known cause to something that is in their control, whether or not it's related. "In the past five years, 74 citi…
Re: Vitamin D improves survival in Covid-19 elderly patients
#34What is it with the obsession over vitamin D on HN?
Re: Vitamin D improves survival in Covid-19 elderly patients
#35The headline here (HN) is not the one of the source. It's also not what the study says.
The study says: >Bolus vitamin D3 supplementation during or just before COVID-19 was associated with better survival rate in frail elderly. That's rather close to the headline.
Re: Vitamin D improves survival in Covid-19 elderly patients
#36I am curious to know why countries didn't buy large quantities of vitamin D and distribute them to all people? Wouldn't that be cheaper and more effective than complete lockdowns, full hospitals, etc.?
Re: Vitamin D improves survival in Covid-19 elderly patients
#37I am curious to know why countries didn't buy large quantities of vitamin D and distribute them to all people? Wouldn't that be cheaper and more effective than complete lockdowns, full hospitals, etc.?
Re: Vitamin D improves survival in Covid-19 elderly patients
#38In my reading, this study is weak evidence. This was not a randomized, controlled trial, but historical analyses of a natural experiment. In itself, that's not a problem: we can learn a lot from natural experiments. But I don't think this instance is much of an "experiment."
As I understand it, all of the residents (96 in total) of a particular nursing home receive regular Vitamin D supplementation. Of the total residents, 66 got COVID-19. Among that group, they realized that 57 of them had received their Vitamin D supplementation either within a week of being diagnosed with COVID-19, or one month prior. That is the intervention group. The remaining 9 people are the "comparator" group. They found the intervention group had better survivability.
The main three reasons I consider this study weak evidence is that the number of people in the "comparator" group is very small (9!), and they - as far as I can tell - do not explain why these people did not receive their normal Vitamin D supplementation. The "comparator" group is supposed to have had a similar baseline, but there's still, to me, a strong possibility of a confounding factor. Finally, there were four total interventions: corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine, "dedicated antibiotics" and the observation about Vitamin D. The more things you try, the less surprising it should be that there is a correlation along one of them.
Re: Vitamin D improves survival in Covid-19 elderly patients
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
The study says: >Bolus vitamin D3 supplementation during or just before COVID-19 was associated with better survival rate in frail elderly. That's rather close to the headline.
No. The HN headline implies causation. The study result does not. (The study authors try to imply causation as well, but that's not what the study says.)
Re: Vitamin D improves survival in Covid-19 elderly patients
#40Friendly reminder: vitamin D3 can affect sleep if taken later in a day. I tend to skip if I forget to take it before noon. Also, D3 without additional K2 may lead to calcium excess.
More from doctors successfully treating covid with vitamins: https://youtu.be/LwlTQ52Wdro