I (truly) wish these people good luck and hope they find the happiness they seek. I am from near Tulsa and there's absolutely no way in hell you'll ever catch my family moving back to there. It's hot, humid, comes with tornadoes, you have to drive everywhere (and everywhere is set up on the assumption you will drive). Plus, I will never forget the clerk at the licensing office who, after the rules changed to require…
Bay Area applicants flood program that pays them $10k to move to Tulsa
101–110 of 195 posts
Re: Bay Area applicants flood program that pays them $10k to move to Tulsa
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would love for Tulsa to succeed at creating a "new silicon valley" It could be great for the area, great for the people who are early movers, etc I don't think it will be, but I think ideas like this are good experiments. You need a certain amount of gravity before you have a good tech scene, and I am interested in knowing "what does that gravity look like? How can such friction to becoming a tech hub be erased?" H…
There are literally dozens of places around the world trying to be the next Silicon Valley, and they have been trying for years. Silicon Bayou (Louisiana) Silicon prairie (Des Moines) Silicon Slopes (Salt Lake) Silicon Alley (New York) Silicon Beach (LA) Silicon Forest (Portland) It takes much more than some tax breaks and a $10,000 moving credit. I hope Oklahoma figures something out, but this is hardly a differenti…
Re: Bay Area applicants flood program that pays them $10k to move to Tulsa
#103I understand people who have roots in the bay area and aren't in the position to leave (or just don't want to). I also understand people who, under the current circumstances, want to temporarily or permanently move to a location that will work out better for them. I don't understand, though, how $10K can be the deciding factor for someone for such a major decision.
$10k is a lot of money outside high COL areas. where I live, that could easily cover the move and six months of living expenses while a single person sets up a new life.
Re: Bay Area applicants flood program that pays them $10k to move to Tulsa
#104Re: Bay Area applicants flood program that pays them $10k to move to Tulsa
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
This won't happen, and Oklahoma/Tulsa needs to fess up to that reality and make a real plan for their economic future. If we're honest, DC/AZ/OR are the "third tech hubs" after SF and then Seattle/Boston/NYC. The ambition for a midwest tech hub to join those ranks is not insane in general. Pittsburgh could make a reasonable play because, unlike Tulsa, in Carnegie Mellon it actually does have a continuous pipeline of…
DC/AZ/OR seems like an odd choice for third-tier tech hubs. If I had to rank U.S. metro areas in terms of favorability for tech, I would do: Tier 1: Bay Area Tier 2: NYC, Seattle, Boston Tier 3: Research Triangle, Pittsburg, Chicago Tier 4: Austin, Boulder, Portland, LA/Santa Monica, Ann Arbor Tier 5: Everywhere else. There's some industry-specific tech support in various other cities (eg. oil in Houston, automotive…
I'm always surprised by how much tech. we have here now. So much more opportunity then back in 2000s..
Re: Bay Area applicants flood program that pays them $10k to move to Tulsa
#106Re: Bay Area applicants flood program that pays them $10k to move to Tulsa
#107I understand people who have roots in the bay area and aren't in the position to leave (or just don't want to). I also understand people who, under the current circumstances, want to temporarily or permanently move to a location that will work out better for them. I don't understand, though, how $10K can be the deciding factor for someone for such a major decision.
$10k is a lot of money outside high COL areas. where I live, that could easily cover the move and six months of living expenses while a single person sets up a new life.
Re: Bay Area applicants flood program that pays them $10k to move to Tulsa
#108I understand people who have roots in the bay area and aren't in the position to leave (or just don't want to). I also understand people who, under the current circumstances, want to temporarily or permanently move to a location that will work out better for them. I don't understand, though, how $10K can be the deciding factor for someone for such a major decision.
Think about all the people behind on their rent and/or need to break their lease (an additional month rent) to move otherwise they risk a court ordered eviction, a debt judgement, and being on the “do not rent” list for all landlords everywhere forever no matter if the monthly rent is 1/10th the amount that caused the problem during a global pandemic. A $10k cash infusion solves all or a lot of that in most cases. Ma…
Re: Bay Area applicants flood program that pays them $10k to move to Tulsa
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
The "new silicon valley" is already Phoenix, AZ.
Based on what? Not disputing you, legitimately curious. I am considering moving to Phoenix. Thanks!
Re: Bay Area applicants flood program that pays them $10k to move to Tulsa
#110I (truly) wish these people good luck and hope they find the happiness they seek. I am from near Tulsa and there's absolutely no way in hell you'll ever catch my family moving back to there. It's hot, humid, comes with tornadoes, you have to drive everywhere (and everywhere is set up on the assumption you will drive). Plus, I will never forget the clerk at the licensing office who, after the rules changed to require…
I think your painting with a pretty broad brush. Sitting aside your bad experience at the licensing office (and general negativity on the culture), someone moving from SF may have a higher quality of life, depending on what they value. For example, more space, lower cost of living, lower taxes, ability to travel more, save more, have a larger house, etc. You can trade tornado's for wild-fire's and earthquakes. I live…