Earlier quoted context omitted.
For me, when the disagreement is about turning the planet into a hollow cinder for naked protection of wealth accrued in an unjust system and justified by Puritanical memes of free will and individualism, it's either a naughty word ascribing malice or one ascribing stupidity. (Consequentially, the difference is sadly zero.)
> turning the planet into a hollow cinder There is disagreement about the magnitude of things, but this is hyperboloic. > for naked protection of wealth An opinion on their motives. > accrued in an unjust system There's so much that can be discussed there. But simple, name one system that isn't unjust in some way. You can optimize for advancement though capitalism, or you can optimize for equality though communism, o…
>There is disagreement about the magnitude of things, but this is hyperboloic (sic)
It's not hyperbolic. The Earth's new homeostasis after an unchecked greenhouse effect has run its course looks like Venus. If the effect is not stopped the question is not whether this will happen but how long it will take. Quite a while, certainly, but the environment will become inimical to humans much sooner.