Small Copy, Big Impact
steamclock.com
Small Copy, Big Impact
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: Small Copy, Big Impact
#2"Are there features or actions that are underused because their worded in a non-obvious or unappealing way?"
"their" should clearly be "they're". I mean, a post promoting precise "microcopy" should at least get the basics right, I think.
Re: Small Copy, Big Impact
#3Re: Small Copy, Big Impact
#4Re: Small Copy, Big Impact
#5I've never really given microcopy thought... I probably need to look into that. I'm actually really struggling with copy and messaging right now on https://qvault.io . If anyone on here takes a peek at the landing page I would love to hear feedback!
Here's some feedback:
- It wasn't clear to me what your company does after reading your home page.
- When I saw the "Courses" section it clicked. But I only read that far because you asked for feedback.
- You should lead with what you do or what benefit the customer will receive.
- For example, the main title on your home page should be something like "Learn computer science by playing games" or "Fun, self-guided computer science courses"
I would highly recommend https://copyhackers.com/.
Re: Small Copy, Big Impact
#6I think they should fix the development processes before the copy strategy.
Re: Small Copy, Big Impact
#7I hate to be pendantic, but: "Are there features or actions that are underused because their worded in a non-obvious or unappealing way?" "their" should clearly be "they're". I mean, a post promoting precise "microcopy" should at least get the basics right, I think.
Re: Small Copy, Big Impact
#8Mmm, ok, however, the example just looks like bad sync between the server side and UX/copy teams because of poorly written user stories. I think they should fix the development processes before the copy strategy.
Re: Small Copy, Big Impact
#9I hate to be pendantic, but: "Are there features or actions that are underused because their worded in a non-obvious or unappealing way?" "their" should clearly be "they're". I mean, a post promoting precise "microcopy" should at least get the basics right, I think.
Quite right – typo now fixed.