Live data from Hacker News

PinePhone – KDE Community edition

kde.org

31–40 of 154 posts

Re: PinePhone – KDE Community edition

#31
post #3

I'm one of the Plasma Mobile developer and I would be happy to answer questions.

Great to see that, congratulations to everybody involved.

Is the hardware of Pinephone considered stable?

How is the development on such platform, the same a on Desktop GNU/Linux? Do we have a permission system similar to Android? Can we launch easily background application and awake the phone when needed (for notifications)? Is there a documentation on the packaging system?

How long can the battery last at the moment (with mostly idle phone)?

Thanks!

Re: PinePhone – KDE Community edition

#32
post #3

I'm one of the Plasma Mobile developer and I would be happy to answer questions.

Hi! Do the Plasma Mobile developers also provide a distro for the Phone? Is it KDE Neon (Ubuntu) based?

What kind of collaboration is there between the various developers for the PinePhone? There seem to be a lot of Kernels with different patches for HW acceleration, IC power management, modem operation etc [1]. Do you apply these to your kernel?

[1] https://xnux.eu/log/#020

Re: PinePhone – KDE Community edition

#33
post #3

I'm one of the Plasma Mobile developer and I would be happy to answer questions.

How do you see this develop in the future, especially concerning the convergence aspect of it - the ability to hook it up to a monitor and use it as a real desktop computer. Please provide your own personal and unofficial opinion.

Re: PinePhone – KDE Community edition

#35
I got my pinephone (Manjaro) last week and tried all OSs there are for it; I really love the idea of having a real Linux device in my pocket (that's why I have the Pandora, Pyra + GPD pocket 1 as well); it is such a difference having full control and being able to change whatever how you work instead of having large corps decide. Also shows, by the 'missing apps' between ecosystems, how much we need replacements for all the proprietary social sites, chat, collaboration etc.

However there is a lot that needs to be done software wise, which made me think that if I want to have a solid Linux device that really fits in my pocket like a phone with actual speech and 4g(5g?) then a lot more people will need to help with this. I don't know how that will happen, but, like I did with the Pandora, with this device I will try to work with the community in reporting and fixing bugs.

For now, this is a device for people who like freedom of their device (well, at least as much as we can get with modern circuits) and who like to tinker. I would recommend it to those people who envision an open source phone in their future; we need to help + stimulate the people trying.

Edit: it is trivial to try all OSs, so whatever you buy, you can switch rather rapidly and take them all for a spin.

Re: PinePhone – KDE Community edition

#36
post #10
post #3

I'm one of the Plasma Mobile developer and I would be happy to answer questions.

Any such plan for KDE edition for Purism Librem 5?

No "Edition" but Plasma Mobile is supported on PureOS/Librem 5 and it's possible to switch to use that in place of Phosh should you want: https://developer.puri.sm/Librem5/Development_Environment/Bo...

I am not sure how up to date Plasma Mobile is in these repos though. It's been a while since I tried it out.

Re: PinePhone – KDE Community edition

#37
post #4

I will be getting this! I wish one day it would include a super high quality camera like Samsung then it would be perfect.

For me it's the LCD screen versus an AMOLED that is a big blocker on mobile devices.

But as I understand for now this will probably mostly be used by hackers and developers themselves, not as a daily driver for lambda users who are conscious about freedom and privacy yet, so the hardware choices make sense.

Re: PinePhone – KDE Community edition

#38
post #29

Probably something to be on a lookout for future releases: it would be better for a regular user if all core applications were named by their function, e.g. Megapixels -> Camera, Kalidori -> Calendar, Angelfish -> Web Browser, etc.

The package names and process names won't change, so this just hides important info. Your browser hangs, you go into htop, you realize you're not sure what it's called. Same with installing them or uninstalling them. I do not think this is an area where you should dumb things down.
Post reply on HN