Live data from Hacker News

Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

text.npr.org

341–350 of 889 posts

Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

#341
It's a bit like they're making a fantasy second reality where stuff like

>All of the mechanical “glitches” that took place on Election Night were really THEM getting caught trying to steal votes. They succeeded plenty, however, without getting caught. Mail-in elections are a sick joke!

is true. (recent presidential tweet). Not quite sure what the endgame is.

Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

#342

Big Tech and Big Media really overplayed their hand this time, IMO. Millions and millions of people are now skeptical and looking for an alternative, even from Fox News. It might not be to Parler, or to the next site after that, but fragmentation will continue to happen. Facebook and media at large only have power if they have viewers, which is a far less stable resource than iron, or oil, or other corporate mainstay…

Calling a vague group of entities 'Big X' isn't as useful as people think. It's not like there is a strong definition, or that everyone identifies the same with it. It's also not helpful to personify a vague group of even more groups (of business entities) and then assume they all had some concerted 'hand to play'. It's possible that there is some emergent behaviour in markets with large companies and it might even s…

It must’ve been my imagination all the times that Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc banned conservative accounts the same day. Several times.

Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

#343

No one wants to spend time on the Internet listening to a bunch of randos talking about how the Jews are secretly lizard people manipulating the elections except other such crackpots. These platforms are lightning rods. Let these people go there and convince each other of their fringe conspiracy theories. Freedom of association and all that. If they will stop polluting normal places with their crackpottery we're all…

> No one wants to spend time on the Internet listening to a bunch of randos talking about how the Jews are secretly lizard people manipulating the elections except other such crackpots. I don't think that is representative of users of Parler. I would agree with you if you said Gab. This may surprise you but the vast vast majority people are joking about the likes of the lizard people. It is a bit of fun because of ho…

> This may surprise you but the vast vast majority people are joking about the likes of the lizard people.

Exactly. Today's social media is a humourless place. No-one can take a joke, or perhaps even see one.

Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

#344

Big Tech and Big Media really overplayed their hand this time, IMO. Millions and millions of people are now skeptical and looking for an alternative, even from Fox News. It might not be to Parler, or to the next site after that, but fragmentation will continue to happen. Facebook and media at large only have power if they have viewers, which is a far less stable resource than iron, or oil, or other corporate mainstay…

2020, or more likely 2016 will perhaps be seen as a turning point in the fortunes of the US Republic, when the democracy began to unravel, the law was used as a weapon against enemies, and the rule of law was replaced by mob rule with different factions warring in the streets. The parallels between the US at this moment and pre-war Europe or Rome at the time of the Catiline conspiracy are striking - the centre cannot…

Historians actually point to Vietnam as the point when the average American gave up on their government.

Once that happened, the government gave up on the average American, allowed middle class jobs to disappear, and spent more time joining global virtue signaling parties and subsidizing bombs in Yemen than fixing lead pipes in cities.

Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

#345

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It s still a good way to follow current events by following specific people or journalists. Switching to chronological mode, aggressively unfollowing the rude people who think that their technical knowledge allows them to plaster their opinions on your face, and changing my location to burundi did it for me.

Just out of curiosity, what is up with changing location to Burundi? Does that change targeted political ads or something?

No more trending topic suggestions. Apparently nothing happens in burundi which is great. It also stopped suggesting me local politicians but i m not sure it's related

Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

#346

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On Twitter I also mainly lurk. I've found it to be the best place to get the detailed news I want (for example, Wasserman or Cohn for election result), but know to avoid comments unless I'm looking for pure entertainment. But, I have all Twitter alerts turned off, and only check every few days. I rarely look at my own Twitter timeline and instead go directly to people's timeline who I have found will have the news I'…

If you only want to visit other people's timelines, you might want to have a look at https://nitter.net It's a blazing fast way of accessing Twitter content.

Neat! Thanks!

Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

#347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Recall that for at least 3 years, Reddit, here, and many other places were pushing the Russia collusion conspiracy theory. Nobody can fact check for you. You need to make your own opinions based on the knowledge you have, and suppressing information does not make you more informed.

> many other places were pushing the Russia collusion conspiracy theory. I might be out of touch but isn't it fairly established at this point that - for certain definitions of "collusion" - it was factually true? i.e. not "Trump got together with Putin and hatched a plan" true but "both sides obliquely acknowledged the interests of the other with a nod and a wink" true?

I'm not one for comprehension, but are you stating that if China prefers to have Biden at the helm, and if he wins that they colluded to get him there? Quite the gymnastics friend.

Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

#348

In mid October I deleted almost all my tweets and likes (but Twitter being so shit they are still showing my likes except it’s not liked anymore lol) and have not been tweeting anything anymore. I found Twitter too toxic, it made me angry with people for no reason, so I deleted all my tweets and the app. No more notifications, no more “just checking Twitter quickly”. I now go to Twitter like once a day just to have a…

I had to accept recently that anything trying to emulate Twitter will suffer from the same problems. I wrote about it: https://kyefox.com/2020/09/17/mastodon-shows-its-stripes/

Since then, my favorite instance was killed by a bunch of irony-poisoned instances ganging up on it to convince others it was a toxic hell (projection!) and defederate from it. The instance was basically dead within a week as people migrated off to avoid losing contact with friends on the fediverse.

https://twitter.com/DamienGranz/status/1314710715635204103

It's not much different from people ganging up on someone on Twitter to report them into an automated suspension.

Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

#349
It’s sad because these companies had a very easy solution to activate once we got in the season.

Simply limit how far something can go viral. Let any family photos take precedence. Let at most 1000 people view any news article, and shadow ban the rest.

Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter

#350

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why can’t the dissenting States just secede from the Union? It is a democracy after all.

It's not a democracy, it's a federal republic.

It's a constitutional republic / representative democracy. Republics and democracies aren't mutually exclusive. It's certainly not a direct democracy, but that doesn't make it not a democracy.
Post reply on HN