Earlier quoted context omitted.
> 5 year EV is much lower in tech than finance for Harvard grads. I'm not sure ab consulting. Based on what? This is not true in my experience, unless you're comparing finance tech to FANG tech, in which case it is true. Moreover, at Harvard, some segment of those who go into finance are "connected" with higher paying finance jobs due to their parents/etc. Consulting salaries are lower (sometimes substantially) than…
Yeah, tech has a starting salary advantage but FAANG just doesn't compare on the upside. What's the top 10% of FAANG outcomes (for Harvard grads) after 5 years? 500k, maybe? The jump to MD in finance makes 1M+ something like 10-20% of outcomes (for Harvard grads) after 10 years. I'd be very surprised if it were that common in tech (over the next 10 years, I know that it was better in the 2000s). I think quickest to M…
The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
91–100 of 325 posts
Re: The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think most people did ok. Enron had a lot of really smart people. Morally bankrupt, but very smart. No different than any of these big tech companies. People like money, smart people will be attracted to it. Companies like smart people so I don't think they will have a hard time getting another job.
I've interviewed several smart people from Palantir and naturally I did not hire them. They might as well wear a scarlet letter.
Re: The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
#93> For the majority of Ivy Leaguers, the most impressive thing they've accomplished is achieving admission to their university. Is this a common view in the US? In central Europe, the view is that ivy leagues are for people who need external validation so much that they are willing to pay through the nose for it. This view explains the rest of the article too.
For instance Harvard automatically gives a full scholarship to any accepted student whose family makes less than $65,000 per year. For Stanford, the cutoff is $125,000.
There are other private schools that are as you describe, though.
Re: The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
#94Re: The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, I evaluated their lack of a functioning moral framework to conclude they couldn't possibly perform a function in my organization because ethics are much more important than the ability to traverse directed graphs in pseudo-code on whiteboards. If a candidate told me they got fired for intentionally sabotaging Palantir's production operations, that would neutralize the issue. So far haven't met that person.
You seem very confident they won’t find anything morally objectionable with your company and decide to sabotage your operations.
Re: The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
#96Goldman, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan have all moved down market and lead most IPOs these days. Everyone else is fighting for 30% or less of the fees. As a CEO, you can’t lose your job if they mess up your IPO. But if you choose Jefferies and they blow it, you can get fired. There is a term for this that is escaping me right now. There is also a potentially easier path to get an intro as the Goldman brand name carries…
That argument was originally used for IBM I think?
Sadly, Cisco decided the stop making proper networking equipment and ditch proper support via TAC.
Re: The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the average Ivy League graduate only makes marginally more money than your public school graduate I'm pretty sure that's not true. I doubt there's much of an actual value-add in going to an elite school, but the average incomes of graduates of them are substantially higher than that of random public school graduates. https://www.payscale.com/college-salary-report/bachelors
Yes, and the gap grows even wider when you normalize for per-professional degree percentages (i.e. STEM/pharm/premed/prelaw/military inflating the bottom half of the curve)
Re: The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
You seem very confident they won’t find anything morally objectionable with your company and decide to sabotage your operations.
If it's so difficult to discern a difference between your company and Palantir, you've got a problem.
Re: The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
#99Re: The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
#100Yes, there are people who genuinely enjoy these positions. But they are truly few and far between. The more in demand a position is, the less pressure the employer has to actually make it a fulfilling experience.
To be fulfilled, we often have to unlearn conventional lessons: https://productlessons.substack.com/p/unlearning-the-first-2...