No thanks, I prefer convenience over paranoia.
Don't use third party auth to sign in
351–360 of 544 posts
Re: Don't use third party auth to sign in
#352Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really the dumbest, most confusing design I've ever seen to make a website seem like it knows who you are when you visit as a guest. When I first saw it on Pinterest, it took me a moment to figure out what I was looking at as a web developer of 20 years. My girlfriend still didn't get it after I was explaining it to her. How does anyone else have a shot at arriving at "oh, so the site doesn't actually have access to…
If you empathize with normal users, you realize they don't care the least about any of this. They want to use a convenient service to do things. To post pictures of themselves, to see what their friends and frenemies are up to, what's the new cool thing etc etc. Login should just work, nobody cares what is displayed where, and which site knows what. Normal people (outside the HN) bubble don't care about these things,…
Re: Don't use third party auth to sign in
#353Earlier quoted context omitted.
No good reason until an exploit comes out that wreaks havoc.
Hard to imagine what sort of exploit could come out that could cause havoc when the encrypted passwords are stored on your device.
Re: Don't use third party auth to sign in
#354Re: Don't use third party auth to sign in
#355Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's no good reason not to use a password manager in 2020. I recommend this one: https://www.passwordstore.org/
No good reason until an exploit comes out that wreaks havoc.
It’s also trivial to have passwords which are secure and easy to remember (literally off the top of my head): MyD0gb@rk$...
Re: Don't use third party auth to sign in
#356Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah. Reddit is especially really intrusive and annoying. I feel like they just don't want people to use their site anymore. Whenever I open new Reddit, my memory and CPU usage goes up so badly.
Reddit website unusable on mobile, it cuts all images in half for me (Nokia 3.1 and Samsung A51), and it's just laggy. I use RedReader from F-Droid instead.
Re: Don't use third party auth to sign in
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes and it pissed me off because on mobile it pops up like 0.5-2 seconds late so if you're unlucky you go to click on something and it popups up under your finger and you've suddenly signed up and shared your info with a company you had no intention of ever signing up with. I complained to Google. I have a GSuites domain and I don't want my users to be able to sign up via Google. No resolution. I suggest you all comp…
Also I reflexively clicked ok out of laziness and annoyance without knowing what it was. Not quite a dark pattern but you certainly aren’t completely aware what it’s asking within the first second of seeing it.
That is one example of a dark pattern.
Re: Don't use third party auth to sign in
#3582. Developers should always allow restoring passwords for SSO only users, it is ridiculous for it to even be an issue.
3. As a user, refrain fro using free email accounts to identify on a platform, as others already said, buy a domain not an expensive one, and stick to it, remember to renew, and setup your email address with a reliable service, there are good providers for $1 a month.
Update: line separation...
Re: Don't use third party auth to sign in
#359Earlier quoted context omitted.
See also: Kindle books; movies "purchased" from Amazon, Apple, et al; Tesla upgrades you paid extra for; I could go on....
I have yet to hear about the first amazon account ban. I don’t think they’re really interested in that, since the accounts are almost by definition making them a bunch of money.
So, not an Amazon account ban, but you quickly learn you are not "buying" a movie, but renting it, sometimes with silly restrictions like "only from these IPs".
Re: Don't use third party auth to sign in
#360Earlier quoted context omitted.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of historian jobs in 2019 was 3500 - that's in the entire US. So... incredibly rare, really.
They did say "degree in history" rather than "job as historian" though.