Qwant: The Search Engine That Respects Your Privacy
21–30 of 110 posts
Re: Qwant: The Search Engine That Respects Your Privacy
#22At some point, we're going to cut the branding middle-man, and put Bing on the front page of HN as a viable alternative to Google Search. Not as sexy as the high-minded front organizations that reskin it, but it'd be nice if we could be honest with ourselves about the beasts we were feeding.
Re: Qwant: The Search Engine That Respects Your Privacy
#23This was posted in another thread, but I'd never seen it before. French-made. Results seem just as good as Google, PutLocker searchers work, and it's as privacy-respecting as DDG. I've been using it all day and I'm happy with the results, so I thought I'd share.
I have a better one: https://infinitySearch.Co It's Open-source, it's a search engine (they have their own crawler and their own index) and it's private!!!
Re: Qwant: The Search Engine That Respects Your Privacy
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a better one: https://infinitySearch.Co It's Open-source, it's a search engine (they have their own crawler and their own index) and it's private!!!
The slashes after the colon should be forward slashes (/) rather than backslashes (\).
I mean: I've developed websites... What the was in my head?!
LOL
THANKS for not letting me look like a dumb for too much long
Re: Qwant: The Search Engine That Respects Your Privacy
#25I've been generally happy with startpage.com, they seem to mirror Google's results. And it works with dark mode. You don't get the contextual niceties that you get with Google though e.g. results for "70F in C".
Re: Qwant: The Search Engine That Respects Your Privacy
#26Re: Qwant: The Search Engine That Respects Your Privacy
#27So here we are:
1. They are not Open-Source (as opposite to Searx).
Only the plugins are. Can we trust them when they say to respect our privacy ?
2. They are not TOR friendly.
Full of captchaS !!!
3. They have no onion site.
DDG have one.
4. They run some kind of weird analytics.
Each time we click on a search, the JS code trigger a fetch to `https://api.qwant.com/api/action/url` and include: - our current language - the query we searched - the link we clicked - etc... They were backed by Bing before, is it still the case or are they running their own stats engine? I do not know. If we trigger ourself some false fetches, can we show "twitter" as first result when someone searches for "facebook"?
5. Their lite version is not lite (=/= duckduckgo.com/html/).
They redirect all our clicks to be able to run their analytics without the JS's fetch API (proof: `https://lite.qwant.com/?l=fr&q=hacker+news&t=web` the first link does not offer `https://news.ycombinator.com` but `https://lite.qwant.com/redirect/yFOdE8r1P1LTSLsA9IIBNKaZmDF1...`). Possible attack with `https://lite.qwant.com/redirect/yFOdE8r1P1LTSLsA9IIBNKaZmDF1...` (see the fake "&query") ? Also, They cannot store the config: go to settings, do whatever you want, do your search, switch tab (go to "news" for example) => your settings are reset to default. You may fix it by adding your settings to the link "&l=fr...".
6. Their front-side is broken.
If we visit their site without user-agent, we have an exception in their JS which crash the page (blank page). And their is more.
7. They do not care.
I emailed them maybe 5-6 bugs, they never replied nether fixed them.
8. Their API is sometime weird (just because not documented ?).
I ran a custom front-end without Qwant's analytics and the minimum working request is: `https://api.qwant.com/api/search/web?q=hackernews&count=10&o...`. What is "&uiv=4"? Why can't it be null or 0? What is "&t="? Is it really needed? Why is it not needed everywhere? => `https://api.qwant.com/api/suggest?q=duckduck`.
In sum up, in a customer point of view, Qwant is just a frenchy Google hosted mainly in Europa and allowed in China. Nothing new here, I recommend to stick to DDG for the moment.
Edit: fix minor typo + add proof for QwantLite analytics
Re: Qwant: The Search Engine That Respects Your Privacy
#28Bing sets cookies. Qwant does not set cookies.
Qwant, i.e., lite.qwant.com, prefixes search result URLs to point to Qwant servers. Qwant redirects www.qwant.com to lite.qwant.com when Javascript is disabled. Bing does not prefix search results.
Bing requires sign-up in order to use their API. Qwant's undocumented API is freely accessible, no sign-up.
Qwant, i.e., lite.qwant.com, requires a User-Agent header. Bing does not require a UA header.
Example of Qwant API
curl "https://api.qwant.com/api/search/videos?q=example&count=150&offset=0&f=xyz&t=xyz&l=en_gb&uiv=xyz"Re: Qwant: The Search Engine That Respects Your Privacy
#29This was posted in another thread, but I'd never seen it before. French-made. Results seem just as good as Google, PutLocker searchers work, and it's as privacy-respecting as DDG. I've been using it all day and I'm happy with the results, so I thought I'd share.
It's just a front for Bing. The company is pure hype, no results.
There are actual results - as a public subsidies scam!
Re: Qwant: The Search Engine That Respects Your Privacy
#30At some point, we're going to cut the branding middle-man, and put Bing on the front page of HN as a viable alternative to Google Search. Not as sexy as the high-minded front organizations that reskin it, but it'd be nice if we could be honest with ourselves about the beasts we were feeding.