Live data from Hacker News

macOS Big Sur

apple.com

471–480 of 837 posts

Re: macOS Big Sur

#471

Just want to put here that if you're using a Mac and haven't tried Safari recently, you're missing out. A few things: - Battery life is fantastic compared to Chrome/FF - Privacy seems to be top-notch - The tab ordering situation is now chrome-like (my biggest gripe in older versions of safari) - Experimental features are 1 click away, easily enable/disable WebGL2 - Support for the WebExtensions standard means addons…

Anyone have recommendations for vim simulator plugins?

Re: macOS Big Sur

#472
post #245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you want something friendlier than running du in Terminal, OmniDiskSweeper is free: https://www.omnigroup.com/more

My go to disk space inspector has always been the free Grand Perspective, such a useful and clever way to show disk usage graphically. You’ll be able to quickly see what folders are taking up space and more so easily see what folders and files in those folders are taking up the most space. http://grandperspectiv.sourceforge.net/

+1 for Grand Perspective, already helped me lots of times

Re: macOS Big Sur

#473
Currently there is an outage preventing users from downloading the update - also experiencing extreme slowness on all macs after having selected the update for download - even though the download has failed. Not a good sign of things to come.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#474

Just want to put here that if you're using a Mac and haven't tried Safari recently, you're missing out. A few things: - Battery life is fantastic compared to Chrome/FF - Privacy seems to be top-notch - The tab ordering situation is now chrome-like (my biggest gripe in older versions of safari) - Experimental features are 1 click away, easily enable/disable WebGL2 - Support for the WebExtensions standard means addons…

I would love to use safari, but I am a big fan of having separate chrome windows for different google accounts (personal vs work) and I don't think safari can handle this.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#476
post #301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can still only open about 15 tabs, after which the Safari tab bar turns into a completely unusable horizontally-scrolling list. Chrome solved this a decade ago... just keep shrinking the tabs down to Favicon size or smaller. Safari just added Favicon images last year, and I don't even think they're visible by default. --- EDIT: Favicon-only compact tabs to have actually been changed/added in Safari 14 for Big Sur…

> Chrome solved this a decade ago... just keep shrinking the tabs down to Favicon size or smaller. Safari just added Favicon images last year, and I don't even think they're visible by default. Don't give them too much credit. For a very long time, the minimum size for chrome tabs resulted in them hiding the favicon, becoming a completely useless row of triangles. And to add insult to injury, the tabs were still big…

Even when you have a lot of Chrome tabs open, you still mostly always see the favicon.

When it stop showing the favicons, that's when you really know you have too many tabs open.

It's a bit of a feature, really. The tabs are still completely usable, but not seeing the favicons was just annoying enough that it changed my behavior and would cause me to finally close a bunch of my open tabs.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#477
post #284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe this should be formalized, like automatically get open tabs into easily searchable persistent storage, whether they are called Bookmarks or not. Then they can be closed by prompting to "clean up". Maybe even skip that manual step entirely. People use browser histories like emails now -- by searching, not by active organizing.

I was about to say, you just described browser history!

It's completely, totally and utterly different from browser history!

If I visit HN, browse a bunch of comment threads, and find something I want to come back to later, that's 1 tab but 20 history entries.

Same if I searched for something on Google and eventually found something I want to come back to later. Except that's 1 tab and 50 history entries.

To recover that state via history is practically impossible. It's a needle in a haystack. I've occasionally needed to do it, and it takes a long time.

(Compared with a tab, a bookmark doesn't work well either for something to come back to. Anything where there is a context, such as scroll position. Perhaps if bookmarks were better, keeping track of scroll position and allowing text to be highlighted or a note to be attached, and showing a thumbnail (scrolled to the right place), and retaining some temporal relationships between different pages. But I find bookmarks consisting of just a title and URL to be completely useless.)

Re: macOS Big Sur

#479

Earlier quoted context omitted.

…which requires an Electron app to constantly be running for it to really work. Not great.

why does it work like this in macos? (meaning - it seems to be running an outside process to block ads, unlike in Chrome where the process is internal to the browser, is this correct? as a windows user i was puzzled by this when installing adguard

It doesn't, the Adguard developers just chose to write their app in such a way that their main app (which is an Electron app) needs to be in the loop for everything.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#480

Just want to put here that if you're using a Mac and haven't tried Safari recently, you're missing out. A few things: - Battery life is fantastic compared to Chrome/FF - Privacy seems to be top-notch - The tab ordering situation is now chrome-like (my biggest gripe in older versions of safari) - Experimental features are 1 click away, easily enable/disable WebGL2 - Support for the WebExtensions standard means addons…

Sorry, as someone who maintains and develops a web application, from my perspective Safari is the new Internet Explorer. I had to wrote so many workarounds for Safari now, it is just annoying. And you even can't write real bug reports for it! The worst was an incorrect daylight saving time handling which drove me nuts, because some users had problems with the application and some not.
Post reply on HN