Live data from Hacker News

macOS Big Sur

apple.com

71–80 of 837 posts

Re: macOS Big Sur

#71

Reminder that with Big Sur, Apple is now bypassing Little Snitch and VPNs for their "services": https://twitter.com/patrickwardle/status/1318437929497235457

I believe you can still block the specific destination IPs with pf using murus if you want, but yes it's quite bothersome.

You can find the full list of apps that bypass it here: /System/Library/Frameworks/NetworkExtension.framework/Versions/A/Resources/Info.plist under ContentFilterExclusionList.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#72

Just want to put here that if you're using a Mac and haven't tried Safari recently, you're missing out. A few things: - Battery life is fantastic compared to Chrome/FF - Privacy seems to be top-notch - The tab ordering situation is now chrome-like (my biggest gripe in older versions of safari) - Experimental features are 1 click away, easily enable/disable WebGL2 - Support for the WebExtensions standard means addons…

it really is very good but the way extensions works is keeping it from ever becoming my main from FF

Re: macOS Big Sur

#73
post #52

I'll be curious to know if virtualizing Windows on an M1 will be faster than running native on my iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2015) in Big Sur. If so, I guess I'll only be missing eGPU capabilities.

You'll first need to get an arm version of Windows for that.

Windows and Office have existed in ARM versions since 2011: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_RT

Windows 10: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/arm/

Windows IoT Core for Raspberry Pi: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=550...

Not to say they'll run on Apple Silicon, mind, but it's not like Windows is x86/AMD64 only.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#74

Just want to put here that if you're using a Mac and haven't tried Safari recently, you're missing out. A few things: - Battery life is fantastic compared to Chrome/FF - Privacy seems to be top-notch - The tab ordering situation is now chrome-like (my biggest gripe in older versions of safari) - Experimental features are 1 click away, easily enable/disable WebGL2 - Support for the WebExtensions standard means addons…

Besides its ad blocking limitations, I'm disappointed that Safari doesn't support WebGL 2 by default. It is the only one of the mainline browsers that doesn't. Firefox, Chrome, and even Edge have had it enabled for eons.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#75

Just want to put here that if you're using a Mac and haven't tried Safari recently, you're missing out. A few things: - Battery life is fantastic compared to Chrome/FF - Privacy seems to be top-notch - The tab ordering situation is now chrome-like (my biggest gripe in older versions of safari) - Experimental features are 1 click away, easily enable/disable WebGL2 - Support for the WebExtensions standard means addons…

As long as the Firefox Containers idea is not implemented I will be sticking with Firefox.

It’s just one of those “no-shit” killer features that a browser touting its privacy-centricity cannot afford to not have

Re: macOS Big Sur

#76
post #39
post #13

Will iTunes disappear in Big Sur - is the alternative equally good? I originally put off installing Catalina because I didn't want to lose iTunes.

Which part of iTunes are you talking about? The device management is now in Finder, music is now in Music, etc.

I mostly just use the music part to organize my MP3's and other formats that I play. Also I have the podcasts there and a bunch of playlists. Let's hope it converts those during the upgrade.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#77
post #13

Will iTunes disappear in Big Sur - is the alternative equally good? I originally put off installing Catalina because I didn't want to lose iTunes.

It is already gone since Catalina. It was replaces by the Music, Podcast, TV apps. iPhone management happens in finder.

I'm glad to hear it happens in Finder. That's a fairly natural place. iTunes and iPhone management was always awkward. Luckily I rarely have to do that in any case.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#78
Is the full screen behavior still the same? Is it possible to disable apps from expanding to full screen and instead only expand to maximum size?

The top menu bar is also hidden when apps go full screen.

I think the only alternative is to hold down option key when expanding the window.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#79
post #22

Just want to put here that if you're using a Mac and haven't tried Safari recently, you're missing out. A few things: - Battery life is fantastic compared to Chrome/FF - Privacy seems to be top-notch - The tab ordering situation is now chrome-like (my biggest gripe in older versions of safari) - Experimental features are 1 click away, easily enable/disable WebGL2 - Support for the WebExtensions standard means addons…

Does it still have adblocking limitations? The same that Chrome wanted to implement?

It now supports WebExtensions like Firefox: https://www.wwdcnotes.com/notes/wwdc20/10665/

That said, it prefers its existing adblock implementation over extensions that block network requests manually, as that functionality is disabled, I think? https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safariservices/saf...

Note also that the existing Safari adblock implementation is not subject to the hard limit of 30,000 rules that Chrome had announced in their V3 manifest format, as you can enable more rule sets to get around length limits. And now, on macOS Safari, you can add companion extensions that could monitor and modify the page after the fact if you need additional scripts to run, but at the cost of privacy and battery life...

I personally use AdGuard, 1Blocker and (my favourite) Small Technology Foundation’s Better Blocker (formerly Ind.ie). I use all three of them (but without any companion extensions, for privacy) on both iOS and macOS and rarely see any ads except the occasional static image that sometimes slips through. edit: I reported the ads I did see and they’re gone now from the sites that had them. So yes, I see no current limitations with Apple’s adblocking system except that it doesn’t apply to other apps, just Safari or other apps using Safari.

Re: macOS Big Sur

#80

Just want to put here that if you're using a Mac and haven't tried Safari recently, you're missing out. A few things: - Battery life is fantastic compared to Chrome/FF - Privacy seems to be top-notch - The tab ordering situation is now chrome-like (my biggest gripe in older versions of safari) - Experimental features are 1 click away, easily enable/disable WebGL2 - Support for the WebExtensions standard means addons…

The lack of integration with other services is why I don't use it. I stick to MSFT Edge which also has improved battery life over Chrome.
Post reply on HN