Notes for courses taken at Harvard (2015-2019)
11–20 of 53 posts
Re: Notes for courses taken at Harvard (2015-2019)
#12Re: Notes for courses taken at Harvard (2015-2019)
#13From the authors website... "These notes are of pretty poor quality, since with I was lost with high probability when I wrote them"
Re: Notes for courses taken at Harvard (2015-2019)
#14You can take 11 modules in one semester? How do you do that? Even assuming they are all 2h per week, do you have to look at the academic calender (or timetable) and try to find all courses which dont overlap?
Re: Notes for courses taken at Harvard (2015-2019)
#15The mod probably should put back the word math in the title
Re: Notes for courses taken at Harvard (2015-2019)
#16From the authors website... "These notes are of pretty poor quality, since with I was lost with high probability when I wrote them"
That does raise the question though as to why the notes have garnered enough attention to necessitate such a comment from the author. Maybe it isn't a good idea to use these notes as reference, but they are of some value. At the very least it is interesting to see that such a large repository of notes of this form exists. The only other collection that is similar to this that I know of is https://dec41.user.srcf.net/…
Also, thanks to other posters too. The two other notes sites are also great.
Re: Notes for courses taken at Harvard (2015-2019)
#17Re: Notes for courses taken at Harvard (2015-2019)
#18Anyone seen something like this for medicine? I'd look to show my daughter that wants to be a medic...
Some of it dumbed down, but lots of it is from professionals and lecturers for actual medical students. I won't post examples because there really is so much that it's useless for me to do so, apart from pointing out the sites I used myself.
On another note, I continue to be amazed by the fact that so often I see people asking in forums instead of Google. It shows how important humans are to humans, no matter what service machines will offer, or how great recorded content is, live content from/with an actual human will be preferred to a large degree.
Just yesterday in some forum somebody asked a question to find a certain novel. I copy-pasted his exact question into Google and found the novel immediately. This is quite common. Is this a topic of discussion at companies like Google? No matter the automation, a lot of humans are very reluctant to interact with the machine(s). It seems to me this is quite an obstacle for companies on the business of putting machines in front of customers instead of humans.
Re: Notes for courses taken at Harvard (2015-2019)
#19People who are interested in learning a subject without attending lectures would be better served by a textbook in the field.