I don't get it. If we have same CPU on MacbookAir and MacbookPro - why would I get more expensive "Pro"? Can someone explain how is Pro faster than Air with same CPU? Also, the "Windows Guy" bit is a bit lame IMO. I have two MacBooks and one custom built PC. The PC is faster than both MacBooks combined.
As one has a fan and the other not, they are probably clocked differently and the cooled one might sustain full power infinitely. The pro also has a larger battery, better speakers and microphones and the touch bar.
Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
51–60 of 1001 posts
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#52Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#53Wait, they pulled out the FAN?
For sure this was expected, but the fan was actually pulled out in the 12" MacBook 2015 edition (dual-core Intel Core M processor). https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/176391/which-macbook-doesnt-have-any-fans/176393
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#5416GB max it looks like.
Edit: If it wasn't clear, this was not a joke. I develop a relatively heavyweight service on the JVM, and between my IDE, the code I run, and all the gradle build daemon stuff, I regularly use up more than 32GB. Often over 50GB. (Although some swap is tolerable, having the majority of my resident set being swapped at any given time means things get very slow.)
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#55I don't get it. If we have same CPU on MacbookAir and MacbookPro - why would I get more expensive "Pro"? Can someone explain how is Pro faster than Air with same CPU? Also, the "Windows Guy" bit is a bit lame IMO. I have two MacBooks and one custom built PC. The PC is faster than both MacBooks combined.
Because of all the other components which are different? A laptop isn't just a CPU.
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#56The pricing is pretty impressive. Shame no 16 inch pro though. Surely they need to update that quick because who is going to want a 16 inch intel Mac now?
Signs point to another event in January, I'd expect it there with a heftier SoC.
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#57Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#58All the Macs looked quite impressive! It was well worth waiting for these (at least for me). But I was disappointed that the maximum RAM is 16GB. I would’ve preferred a 32GB option for better future proofing (especially with web applications needing more and more memory). Edit: Considering the fact that the RAM won’t be upgradeable (it’s part of the SoC), this limitation is a big bummer. What may be worse is that all…
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#59I don't get it. If we have same CPU on MacbookAir and MacbookPro - why would I get more expensive "Pro"? Can someone explain how is Pro faster than Air with same CPU? Also, the "Windows Guy" bit is a bit lame IMO. I have two MacBooks and one custom built PC. The PC is faster than both MacBooks combined.
Because of all the other components which are different? A laptop isn't just a CPU.
Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers
#60I don't get it. If we have same CPU on MacbookAir and MacbookPro - why would I get more expensive "Pro"? Can someone explain how is Pro faster than Air with same CPU? Also, the "Windows Guy" bit is a bit lame IMO. I have two MacBooks and one custom built PC. The PC is faster than both MacBooks combined.