151–160 of 357 posts
By adding stricter typing and a bunch of middleware I can easily imagine a Python EE one day but let's hope that doesn't happen. Duck typing, a taste of functional paradigm, non-verbosity is what makes Python special IMO.
I wonder if Go, Rust might make it to top C one day.
> Python has long been a top-loved programming language, as has Java Um... nobody _loves_ Java. We use it, but we don't love it.
There's nothing to be hated about any programming language ever. People confuse "I don't understand it" with "I hate it".
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually do due diligence on tech firms now for a job, and you're 100% right that the tradeoffs change dramatically when the company grows. Which doesn't mean that using the best thing possible for your expert coders at the beginning is wrong. At the beginning, you need every advantage you can get, and if you have expert programmers, give them the sharpest knife you can find! But yeah, once your company is hiring h…
> I'm writing some Java at the moment for an Android app, and it's just killing me after doing Scheme and Python Android isn't Java though. It's some frankenstein contraption made from a mutated version of Java from a decade ago. > I were starting my own business now, I'd use Clojure or Scala. I personally wouldn't ever choose Scala for anything. It's tooling is horrible (Sbt is a special hell, and scalac is as slow…
i wonder if Java is judiciously choosing the non crazily digressive parts of Scala, as they both evolve.
I was a total raving Python evangelist for the first 12 years of my coding career, and then got a job as the CTO for a Python based startup that had been running absent a technical leader for 5 years, with relatively junior coders making all the decisions. I still love Python, but I now have a completely different attitude to hyper-dynamic languages (like Python, Ruby, Clojure, Elixir, etc). In my new opinion, they a…
I've often found that starting some quick-and-dirty thing in shell scripts is great, but once I get to around 100 lines of shell script code, I'm better off switching to python (or similar). Similarly, once I get to around 1000 lines of python code, I'm better off switching to compiled, statically typed language (e.g., Java, C, C++, etc.). So my own heuristic has become: shell script when
I was a total raving Python evangelist for the first 12 years of my coding career, and then got a job as the CTO for a Python based startup that had been running absent a technical leader for 5 years, with relatively junior coders making all the decisions. I still love Python, but I now have a completely different attitude to hyper-dynamic languages (like Python, Ruby, Clojure, Elixir, etc). In my new opinion, they a…
IMO I doubt switching language would help. It's the same for any language. You can learn to code easy, but learning to write good code/architecture + working together in a large team is really hard.. takes lots of experience and time till the team can come together.
Rails has a lot of magic that gets you running fast but it doesn't even have a service layer - and instead promotes the abomination that is mixins (concerns), fat models, fat controllers - stuff that gets you running with minimal effort but then crying over the code duplication all over the place and lack of logical separation.
ASP.NET is more verbose out the gate but you're basically guided in to stuff like repository pattern, service layer with POCO models, thin controllers and IoC. Static typing gives you guarantees when reading the code (I've seen RoR concerns that relied on random fields being present in target class, but had conditional logic with implicit assumptions about which class it would be included in - it was a hell to reason about). It's verbose but consistent and built to scale - I'll take a dirty ASP.NET project over a dirty RoR project any day.
I was a total raving Python evangelist for the first 12 years of my coding career, and then got a job as the CTO for a Python based startup that had been running absent a technical leader for 5 years, with relatively junior coders making all the decisions. I still love Python, but I now have a completely different attitude to hyper-dynamic languages (like Python, Ruby, Clojure, Elixir, etc). In my new opinion, they a…
I've seen the same occur with Spring based Java. To me this is similar to the old "no one has gotten fired for going IBM". The new phrase would be "no one has gotten fired for going with a static typed language."
When someone writes bad Java code, we tend to blame the developer. When someone writes bad Python code, we blame Python.
If you think it's the lack of types that make things more difficult to follow, you can always force build failure if type hints aren't provided (which Python has supported for a while now) in the same way you can fail your Java builds if test coverage isn't up to par.
We need to start ranking languages based on what people use them for. Python is certainly #1 in ML, for example, but far from #1 in web. I had a "which stack" argument with a client recently for a web server processing tons of data. He wanted to use Node (which I hate, but also use when performance doesn't matter because TypeScript is so good). I showed him that the Node library ecosystem is actually pretty weak (man…
Just curious, what other server side languages do you feel have a better library ecosystem than Node/JS?
I program in Node/JS currently and programmed in Java about 10 years ago. But my preferred language will always be Ruby. I will never understand why "the community" (ML, scripting etc) preferred Python to Ruby.
I was a total raving Python evangelist for the first 12 years of my coding career, and then got a job as the CTO for a Python based startup that had been running absent a technical leader for 5 years, with relatively junior coders making all the decisions. I still love Python, but I now have a completely different attitude to hyper-dynamic languages (like Python, Ruby, Clojure, Elixir, etc). In my new opinion, they a…
This precise struggle is why Go is created, and also why Rob Pike said what he said. The industry needs a statically typed language with good ergonomics (not typing too much) and performant. I agree with you, asking everyone to be discipline with their code in a dynamic language is a bit too much to ask (unfortunately).
I was a total raving Python evangelist for the first 12 years of my coding career, and then got a job as the CTO for a Python based startup that had been running absent a technical leader for 5 years, with relatively junior coders making all the decisions. I still love Python, but I now have a completely different attitude to hyper-dynamic languages (like Python, Ruby, Clojure, Elixir, etc). In my new opinion, they a…