Earlier quoted context omitted.
Idea: a [view count] link. Once clicked, votes are ignored for that comment. You can vote, or get the social proof, but not both.
No. It's overly complicated for the problem that's trying to be solved. I would have to weigh voting on a comment against seeing how many other people voted on it for EVERY comment. I just want to scan smart comments and learn the sides of an issue quickly. What is the problem we're trying to solve again, anyways? And do the multiple downsides mentioned here multiple times (and heavily upvoted each time) really outwe…
I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvote count
221–230 of 248 posts
Re: I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvote count
#222When I first started reading HN I learned a TON very quickly and everyday about completely new stuff, and was able to do so because I could easily sort through the legitimacy of opinions based on their upvotes. And yet the founder of HN said 25 days ago that there is a problem with HN, "the decreasing quality of comment threads on HN." http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2403696 He summed up the problem by saying "Th…
We hold up individual critical thinking to such high esteem that we seem to dismiss the value in the collected opinions of others.
Re: I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvote count
#223The "old" HN was a lot drier (for lack of a better word), but the discussions were generally much more informative and/or insightful. I remember people complaining about getting downvoted for a comment that would have probably gotten many upvotes on other sites, and I was always pleased to that these in turn were downvoted as well. This doesn't seem to happen any more though, which is a shame IMO.
Re: I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvote count
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
You put that excellently. Indeed, Hacker News was and should be a place where social proof is not desired.
Only in comments, or should we apply that to submissions also? If it weren't for using social proof to decide which stories should be highlighted, why do we have a voting-based front page?
Re: I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvote count
#225Re: I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvote count
#226It's easy to learn in person, just parrot what everyone else is saying. You don't need HN to learn it.
You realize that people game the upvote system right? Writing karma whore comments is so easy when you know the votes. If you really want to know the votes, just reverse engineer the algorithm, it will show you the relative votes.
Re: I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvote count
#227Re: I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvote count
#228When I first started reading HN I learned a TON very quickly and everyday about completely new stuff, and was able to do so because I could easily sort through the legitimacy of opinions based on their upvotes. And yet the founder of HN said 25 days ago that there is a problem with HN, "the decreasing quality of comment threads on HN." http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2403696 He summed up the problem by saying "Th…
1. Show comment-ranges. (1-, 0, 1, 2-10, 10-50 etc.), instead of absolute values. This indicates the quality of a comment, without promoting/prompting voting, based on existing votes (that much.)
2. Do not show username (use a placeholder for profile link). This will solve the problem of "instinctive" up(/down?)voting from commenter's fan base.
3. Any related changes required in the UX, to bubble the better comments more visibility.
Re: I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvote count
#229Re: I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvote count
#230When I first started reading HN I learned a TON very quickly and everyday about completely new stuff, and was able to do so because I could easily sort through the legitimacy of opinions based on their upvotes. And yet the founder of HN said 25 days ago that there is a problem with HN, "the decreasing quality of comment threads on HN." http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2403696 He summed up the problem by saying "Th…
How about this solution to improve the readability of HN threads, without degrading the quality of comments/discussion? 1. Show comment-ranges. (1-, 0, 1, 2-10, 10-50 etc.), instead of absolute values. This indicates the quality of a comment, without promoting/prompting voting, based on existing votes (that much.) 2. Do not show username (use a placeholder for profile link). This will solve the problem of "instinctiv…
Valuing ideas should not be a popularity context.