Live data from Hacker News

Goodbye, Twitter

sneak.berlin

31–40 of 88 posts

Re: Goodbye, Twitter

#31
I'm getting really tired of this argument, and I don't think this post adds anything new to it.

Is censorship bad? Yes. Is QAnon bad? Also yes. Is there an easy answer here? No. What we're doing as a society is running a massive experiment to see the results of several bad options.

Every time I see an article like this, the author doesn't take into account that there is no easy answer here, and that while censorship is bad, all the options are had.

Re: Goodbye, Twitter

#32
Go ahead and complain about Twitter "censoring" things you post. Twitter's a platform. They have to choose what they want on there. Eventually it gets to "Oh, you saw that on Twitter? That's some garbage site where the users post every crazy, unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that comes along." At that point their platform is worthless. Censorship is no different than any other decision about what business you're in. If their decision makes you emotional, oh well.

Re: Goodbye, Twitter

#33
post #11

This author's posts are always ridiculously sensationalized and usually lean on a bunch of misrepresentations to try to make everything sound more dramatic. For this one, he took the time to write a hyperbolic 2500-word rant using both high-minded language and profanity to compare the topic to human rights violations and abusive relationships, but couldn't find the time to remove the TWO Twitter accounts linked in th…

I just deleted it yesterday, and I'm updating the sidebar now (and also switching from Jekyll to Hugo in the process, which is why it's taking a little while). (I also need to update the index page, and probably some others. Will grep.) As for sensationalized: https://sneak.berlin/20201029/traffic/ I'm sorry you didn't like it. I wrote about it because it was a big deal for me, having been a daily user of the site fo…

How’s the Jekyll to Hugo switch? I’ve considered it, but haven’t done it yet.

Currently just hosting on GitHub pages with their built in Jekyll support, but the mess of dependencies is kind of a hassle and Hugo seems nicer.

Re: Goodbye, Twitter

#34

I wish we would deprecate these "Goodby [Twitter | Facebook | Medium | Etc..] articles because a) the author usually assumes that people need to be educated and b) the authors have some axe to grind specific to them. Myself and people I know use these platforms with eyes wide open and find them useful. If a person doesn't like them, quit and spare us the dramatic exit article.

>If a person doesn't like them, quit and spare us the dramatic exit article.

Would you have said the same about the Declaration of Independence? Sometimes it is a great step forward in dissent to outline why you find the current regime intolerable and why you are leaving.

Re: Goodbye, Twitter

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, what is the deal with that, anyway? Twitter is constantly giving me the "something went wrong" message or telling me that I'm being rate-limited even though I only hit the site about 10 times a week.

My guess is their bot/scraper detection not liking anything that's not a 100% standard, extension-free browser. Although I've heard that even people without privacy extensions are getting hit by it, so it may just be a super aggressive bot detection that's randomly hitting everyone or some other bug that Twitter doesn't care because it presumably a) doesn't affect logged in users b) non-logged-in users who go there r…

I see this constantly, but primarily when I click a link to Twitter in an app other than a browser (e.g. Slack). It's been years now, so I'm 100% sure Twitter must know about the issue and have just chosen to not care.

Re: Goodbye, Twitter

#36

I wish we would deprecate these "Goodby [Twitter | Facebook | Medium | Etc..] articles because a) the author usually assumes that people need to be educated and b) the authors have some axe to grind specific to them. Myself and people I know use these platforms with eyes wide open and find them useful. If a person doesn't like them, quit and spare us the dramatic exit article.

> If a person doesn't like them, quit and spare us the dramatic exit article.

Similarly, you could just not read it or downvote & move on

Re: Goodbye, Twitter

#37
I skimmed through the article quickly, and didn’t see any mention of decentralized platforms like Mastadon or Matrix. Instead, there was a recommendation for Signal, which is one more centralized platform that also needs a phone number.

Re: Goodbye, Twitter

#40
post #7

I only really became aware of how bad Twitter's censorship was when I became 'gender critical', as in, I believe in biological reality and don't think that male-bodied people should be in women's prisons, rape shelters, women's sports, with young girls in changing rooms, etc. Then I saw how Twitter (and other social media sites) blocked and banned women (and to a lesser extent, men) from talking about it. It has been…

JK Rowling is still out there being able to share her opinions (similar to yours) to literally hundreds of millions of people so I doubt that this discourse is actually banned from twitter.

I also can't wait for the day where this type of regressive speech will look as ridiculous as the fear on homosexuals in bathrooms not so long ago, but we might need to wait a few more years for that.

Post reply on HN