Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're the one that doesn't understand. It's what makes you so edgy. Keep doing it.
I understand perfectly the difference between a system and a format. You either don’t or you’re trolling (and dishing out ad hominems to boot.). Reddit would be more suitable to your posting style, we come here with a higher expectation of them being actual discourse and intellectual honesty.
What’s so exciting about Postgres?
131–137 of 137 posts
Re: What’s so exciting about Postgres?
#132PostgreSQL isn't exciting. It's boring, with roots in the Berkeley Ingress project from the mid 80s. Which is why 10 years ago, so many HNers went with trendy NoSQL data stores instead, even though they lost data. Data loss is very exciting, and PostgreSQL is very boring. This preference for what's exciting and trendy over what's old and proven is a large reason why so much software today sucks.
Re: What’s so exciting about Postgres?
#133I started using PostgreSQL because, at the time, MySQL wouldn't do subqueries. The fact it silently truncated VARCHAR data to the size of the column and didn't give out an error didn't help much. Overall, my impression is that the project's philosophy is to do the Correct Thing, even if it's slow.
Re: What’s so exciting about Postgres?
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
can you elaborate?
> can you elaborate? On what exactly? The freeze map bit I referenced above is the following commit: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit... Commit a892234f830e832110f63fc0a2afce2fb21d1584 gave us enough infrastructure to avoid vacuuming pages where every tuple on the page is already frozen. So, replace the notion of a scan_all or whole-table vacuum with the less onerous notion of an "aggressi…
Re: What’s so exciting about Postgres?
#135Databases shouldn't be exciting. They should just work . The main reason webcrap works is because the databases underneath work. If the Javascript crowd had to manage data storage, nothing persistent would work reliably.
> Databases shouldn't be exciting. They should just work . With enough experience with the alternative, things that just work are exciting.
Re: What’s so exciting about Postgres?
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good luck running serverless code in a lightbulb.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/iot-edge
Re: What’s so exciting about Postgres?
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Typical frontend developer spew. Works with JavaScript or Emscripten, hasn't dealt with data integrity, scale, or security challenges. Threatened by people who build things from scratch. Stuck writing handlers, never to see the whole architecture. Soon to be replaced by GPT-3. Thank you, this has been entertaining.
This is one of the funniest rebuttals on HN.