Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What's stopping HN going the way of Reddit/Digg/Slashdot?

news.ycombinator.com

61–70 of 78 posts

Re: Ask HN: What's stopping HN going the way of Reddit/Digg/Slashdot?

#61
post #31
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a relative newcomer here, I sincerely hope lolcats are a bannable offense.

Eventually you will grow and you will need to start making things bannable. What you also need to have is a probation system where you can't post for anywhere from 4 hours to a month depending on what you do. That acts as a warning. Get put on probation too many times and you're banned. That's how it works at Something Awful, and they still have pretty good quality after almost 10 years. And they are for-profit. Also…

No, S.A. is a pay site, it's some trouble to get yourself a new credit card, but on free sites you just make a new alias.

Re: Ask HN: What's stopping HN going the way of Reddit/Digg/Slashdot?

#62
post #16
post #6

PG has said he won't let it, and will do what it takes to keep it high quality.

Amen to that! It's the only refuge from all the trash out there. Hopefully fanboys will never invade it...

A good first step is, when you catch yourself making a comment that contributes nothing except maybe some sentiment, to not make it.

Re: Ask HN: What's stopping HN going the way of Reddit/Digg/Slashdot?

#64
post #36

It probably will. I followed a similar path of another person on here: /. -> k5 -> reddit -> HN. At the end of the day, nothing can stop 50 users up-voting cat pictures except to shut the site down.

This is why hacker news has a collection of editors with the power to kill cat pictures with a click.

Don't underestimate the power of mass stupidity. It's killed many sites in the past. Even with a "collection of editors with the power to kill cat pictures with a click."

Re: Ask HN: What's stopping HN going the way of Reddit/Digg/Slashdot?

#65
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is why hacker news has a collection of editors with the power to kill cat pictures with a click.

Don't underestimate the power of mass stupidity. It's killed many sites in the past. Even with a "collection of editors with the power to kill cat pictures with a click."

I don't understand; are you implying that there will simply be too many stories for editors to kill them all? The particular defense HN has against people voting up mind-candy is that editors can (and do) kill those stories. What makes you think this strategy won't work?

Re: Ask HN: What's stopping HN going the way of Reddit/Digg/Slashdot?

#66
post #14

I don't think it's as hard to keep a site from sliding as one might think from the examples of previous sites where things went downhill as they got more popular. Slashdot, Digg, and Reddit were all companies. They wanted to grow. Whereas News.YC is a side project. We don't care about growth. It's much easier to do things to keep up the quality when you're willing to sacrifice growth.

I think this has always been the key. Its like the mom/pop store versus the Walmart super stores. They need (digg/reddit) to be popular to be a viable acquisition target or business whereas hacker news is just a place where we try to find like minded people trying to share information and grow learn together.

Re: Ask HN: What's stopping HN going the way of Reddit/Digg/Slashdot?

#68
I can't believe nobody has mentioned collaborative filtering.

Simple collective voting and new/hot/controversial are very unsophisticated measures of how much any particular user will like something.

For an example of how powerful collaborative filtering is, check out movielens.org

The key is to take each user's votes and use them to figure out based on other peoples' votes what stories and comments to display. Then the community doesn't really "grow". Sure you may get some niche communities that grow, such as people who all tend to upvote cat pictures, but the "thinking person" doesn't have to worry, b/c as long as there is a weak (or negative) correlation between cat pictures and your upvotes, the system will never recommend any to you.

Imagine rather than one massive community, an infinite number of beautifully overlapping ones. I think the ideal system would consider votes for stories and comments, and show each person mostly content that had a high probability of being enjoyed.

The "new" tab might show things with less of a strict filter to prevent false negatives.

The research group that built Movielens has some papers on the web and the math isn't that tough. With a properly design collaborative filtering system there simply will not be the digg/reddit degradation where the site gets so big and noisy and low quality. Sure there may be stories that are hugely popular, but as long as the algorithm gets enough quality input (votes) on a variety of things, no user would get too many duds.

Ironically Reddit's redesign only increases noise by tending people away from the subreddit niche communities that had existed -- I would more likely click on a weak title if in a quality subreddit than if it's the #4 item on the screen.

At the rate it's going, news.yc will surely become the next reddit, and eventually the next Digg. As others have pointed out, we'll all have probably moved on by then to the next site (or hopefully one that implements CF!).

It seems odd to me that nobody has implemented a site like this with CF... As with most of my posts, if anyone wants to collaborate to do an experimental site like this just let me know. There are some cool ruby libraries out there and of course gsl.

Re: Ask HN: What's stopping HN going the way of Reddit/Digg/Slashdot?

#69
post #14

I don't think it's as hard to keep a site from sliding as one might think from the examples of previous sites where things went downhill as they got more popular. Slashdot, Digg, and Reddit were all companies. They wanted to grow. Whereas News.YC is a side project. We don't care about growth. It's much easier to do things to keep up the quality when you're willing to sacrifice growth.

Actually, slashdot manages pretty well. Considering the number of users they have. Their moderation system has matured over time. And the typical WTF, 'funny pics' and youtube crap that ruins other sites is isolated on http://idle.slashdot.org/ where it can harm no-one. I think it starts with comment moderation ( http://slashdot.org/moderation.shtml ). It's hard to get karma on /. by just fooling around, and you have to be a dedicated user to even get to moderate other comments. Contrary to digg where a sensible comment about X can be downmodded into oblivion by an army of 13 year old fanboys.

Re: Ask HN: What's stopping HN going the way of Reddit/Digg/Slashdot?

#70
post #43
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"As you would learn from marketing theory, a user that you have personally screwed with will likely cause 20x more damage to your brand than your best users improve it." I'd say that a jackass active on the site is more damaging than one banned. If you ban someone, you have only upset one user. If you allow a spammer/troll/flamer/etc to continue unchallenged, you have upset all of them. The thing with online communit…

If that could be achieved then, yes you would be quite correct. However, it is very hard to completely cut people off on the Internet. Furthermore, they can start disparaging you through other mediums (eg blogs) and influence people they still know to be using your site.

Once your site is big enough, it won't really be a problem.

In fact, it's unlikely to ever be a problem: if your site is small, nobody on a bigger site is going to care about a someone bitching about it, so the story will get buried. If it's large, any site worth its salt will delete a griefing post to avoid the inter-site grief (see: reddit deleting the posts that lead here, mefi deleting pretty much anything leading to LGF)

Post reply on HN