Live data from Hacker News

Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal)

releases.ubuntu.com

81–90 of 219 posts

Re: Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal)

#81
post #44

I got nervous with Ubuntu releases when 9.10 came out, and it was really buggy; definitely shouldn't have been released in that state. This time round I upgraded a couple of nights ago from the repos, and I'm pleased to say there have been no dramas.

I've had the 11.04 beta installed for a few weeks now, and though there have definitely been some bugs that have come up, even the beta of natty has been really stable overall, much more so than some of the previous Ubuntu releases.

Re: Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal)

#82
post #59

I'm not going back to linux on the desktop until it can sleep my laptop reliably. OSX is so nice for that. Just close the lid and go... I can't imagine working any other way now.

works for me on ubuntu. for 2 different lenovos and a dell.

Re: Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal)

#83
post #59

I'm not going back to linux on the desktop until it can sleep my laptop reliably. OSX is so nice for that. Just close the lid and go... I can't imagine working any other way now.

This, along with automatically using an external monitor when one is plugged in, is the reason that I switched to the Mac for laptops.

As others are saying, it sounds like the suspend/resume feature works well now. I can add that at least on my multi-monitor desktop Ubuntu 10.10 will reliably automatically adjust when I plug in or unplug one of my monitors. I found this out accidentally and it was really a pleasant surprise.

Of course, as always with Linux, both these features probably depend on how well your hardware is supported.

Re: Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal)

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a fellow day-job-using Ubuntu user, I'm with you. In fact, it's not just this release, I always wait a bit to upgrade, since the general consensus seems to be that fresh Ubuntu's are often a bit touchy :)

Not only are fresh Ubuntus a bit touchy, but upgrading in-place has bitten me badly in the past. It's always a clean-slate install for me now.

Yea that too. I've heard bad things, but I've never even attempted it myself. Years of Windows has built up some serious negative reinforcement here :)

Re: Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal)

#85
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't get a choice if you run it in a VM, btw. It's classic or aught.

What virtualization program are you running? If you are using VirtualBox you can run apt-get install virtualbox-ose-guest-utils. You'll also need to enable 3D support under Settings > Display.

Though Unity works as expected (awesome!), there still seems to be some other bugs with VirtualBox integration. A big one for me is that seamless mode doesn't work when running 11.04.

Re: Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal)

#86
Been using Unity and natty for a few weeks now. The only feature I really miss from the gnome interface right now is the ability to add / move / remove toolbar widgets. Has anyone figured out if it's possible / how to do this in Unity?

Overall I feel a lot more productive with Unity. The numerous super- functions are really helpful and nifty. I especially like the super- 1-9 for positioning/resizing windows on the current monitor.

Re: Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal)

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a fellow day-job-using Ubuntu user, I'm with you. In fact, it's not just this release, I always wait a bit to upgrade, since the general consensus seems to be that fresh Ubuntu's are often a bit touchy :)

Not only are fresh Ubuntus a bit touchy, but upgrading in-place has bitten me badly in the past. It's always a clean-slate install for me now.

Apt is the only system I've ever felt fully comfortable with when doing upgrades. It was neither a problem under Debian nor Ubuntu.

Do you have a tendency to make system changes that get in the way of the upgrades? (i.e., where has it gotten stuck for you before?)

Re: Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal)

#89
post #59

I'm not going back to linux on the desktop until it can sleep my laptop reliably. OSX is so nice for that. Just close the lid and go... I can't imagine working any other way now.

It isn't that sleep works reliable on OSX, it's that sleep works reliably on a Mac.

You see, when you buy a Mac you know every feature (including sleep) has been tested thoroughly. When you decide to install an OS on a computer you already own, you put the onus to test on yourself. I don't understand why people continue to make this unfair comparison. If you want a linux computer where sleep just works, by a preinstalled linux computer. System76 makes fantastic ones. They thoroughly test every feature. They test when new versions of Ubuntu get released. You'll have the same experience you have when buying a Mac or when buying an HP.

Post reply on HN