Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
economist.com
Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
1–10 of 292 posts
Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
#2Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
#3Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
#4Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
#5I believe the article they refer to is this one: https://www.nature.com/articles/463608a (full PDF is available)
Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
#6Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
#7Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
#8if they dedicate all their efforts to selling adverts, yes.
Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
#9Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?
#10Genuinely “brainy” people can find new ways to contribute to society, there can never be too any of them.
“Elites” on the other hand - highly credentialed and entitled - play zero-sum games.
There’s a lot of interesting critique written by heterodox leftists today, in the spirit of Chris Lasch, on how the current progressive movement is just intra-elite competition. Take BLM for example: how are Floyd/Blake policing incidents related to removing entrance tests from the super-elite schools and colleges, or shaking down super-elite art galleries until they show more POC artists? Or having a nominally black VP who’s made a career out of prosecuting black criminals?
Or the populist conservative movement appealing to the “non-elite” working class, who the progressives used to represent. This is happening all over the western world.
TLDR: Elite vs. non-elite seems exactly right, but let’s not confuse it with “brainy” please