Live data from Hacker News

Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?

economist.com

1–10 of 292 posts

Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?

#9
post #3

if they dedicate all their efforts to selling adverts, yes.

They aren’t though, a lot are dedicating their efforts to providing liquidity in financial markets

Many are working on new ways to optimize taxes (not) paid by the largest corporations and wealthiest billionaires.

Re: Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?

#10
Turchin uses the term “elites”, which is not the same as “brainy”.

Genuinely “brainy” people can find new ways to contribute to society, there can never be too any of them.

“Elites” on the other hand - highly credentialed and entitled - play zero-sum games.

There’s a lot of interesting critique written by heterodox leftists today, in the spirit of Chris Lasch, on how the current progressive movement is just intra-elite competition. Take BLM for example: how are Floyd/Blake policing incidents related to removing entrance tests from the super-elite schools and colleges, or shaking down super-elite art galleries until they show more POC artists? Or having a nominally black VP who’s made a career out of prosecuting black criminals?

Or the populist conservative movement appealing to the “non-elite” working class, who the progressives used to represent. This is happening all over the western world.

TLDR: Elite vs. non-elite seems exactly right, but let’s not confuse it with “brainy” please

Post reply on HN