Live data from Hacker News

How Satya Nadella turned Microsoft around

economist.com

481–487 of 487 posts

Re: How Satya Nadella turned Microsoft around

#481

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I still think Retail Stores were a red herring. Even if people bought unlocked Windows phones directly from Microsoft Stores they couldn't get SIMs from half the major carriers at any given time as Microsoft was forced not to support given Verizon SIMs as one point due to a dumb war with them and Verizon flat out refusing to allow the devices on to the network. (At a different point AT&T almost did the same thing, bu…

> Apple had/has "luxury brand" caché that Microsoft couldn't build into its stores if it wanted to, and first mover advantage on top of that. I disagree. It takes time, money, and effort to earn people’s trust, but it’s possible. They obviously weren’t going to reverse a decade of shipping malware ridden computers, but they could have put out quality Microsoft products, and spent years earning back people’s trust. An…

Up until the Surface line, Microsoft never shipped any computers at all, much less "malware ridden" ones. I think that exactly illuminates how high of a mountain Microsoft would have needed to climb to earn people's trust when Microsoft is also in general mainstream mindsets saddled with the problems of other company's behaviors.

But if the point was to save the marketshare of Windows phone products via retail store presence, Microsoft didn't have time, they were racing a losing money clock and the shareholders were watching retail operations worried Microsoft was just "throwing good money after bad".

Re: How Satya Nadella turned Microsoft around

#482

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I still think Retail Stores were a red herring. Even if people bought unlocked Windows phones directly from Microsoft Stores they couldn't get SIMs from half the major carriers at any given time as Microsoft was forced not to support given Verizon SIMs as one point due to a dumb war with them and Verizon flat out refusing to allow the devices on to the network. (At a different point AT&T almost did the same thing, bu…

> they couldn't get SIMs from half the major carriers at any given time ... in the USA. Meanwhile the other 90% of the global market awaited.

Yes, that was it's own failure. Especially given some of the big numbers Windows Phones had briefly in major countries like India.

I think it is another reason why doubling down on US retail store operations as an attempted run around the US carriers was ultimately the wrong plan.

Re: How Satya Nadella turned Microsoft around

#483
post #418

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In fairness, Google Cloud Platform is a huge new product. GAE (which I love) was but a tiny drop compared to the vast ocean that is GCP today. And GCP is really a multitude of products. Android was launched in 2008, although I think it really deserves to be in the post-2010 category. Today's Android is a whole different beast. Google Home is a new product. And tied in with Home & Android is voice recognition, which i…

> Google Cloud Platform is a huge new product. Does it define the category? Is Google Cloud 'the' cloud provider? "Just spin up a box on GCP" the default thing for people to do in tech? > Today's Android is a whole different beast. Is it? Android 4 (which was around that time) is pretty close to android as it is now. > Google Home is a new product And? Is it category defining like maps or Mail or GSuite, did it creat…

You seem to be moving the goalpost? "major new product" is a far cry from "defining the category".

That said, Google's voice recognition does "define the category". My iPhone-using friends barely use voice recognition.

Re: How Satya Nadella turned Microsoft around

#484

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Apple had/has "luxury brand" caché that Microsoft couldn't build into its stores if it wanted to, and first mover advantage on top of that. I disagree. It takes time, money, and effort to earn people’s trust, but it’s possible. They obviously weren’t going to reverse a decade of shipping malware ridden computers, but they could have put out quality Microsoft products, and spent years earning back people’s trust. An…

Up until the Surface line, Microsoft never shipped any computers at all, much less "malware ridden" ones. I think that exactly illuminates how high of a mountain Microsoft would have needed to climb to earn people's trust when Microsoft is also in general mainstream mindsets saddled with the problems of other company's behaviors . But if the point was to save the marketshare of Windows phone products via retail store…

[deleted]

Re: How Satya Nadella turned Microsoft around

#485

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m a developer, I use a Mac, it’s still the best Unix laptop out there. But I have a Ryzen 3950X desktop with a real GPU (RTX 2080) running Windows and Linux, for when I am not portable. Same dotfiles for all, any operating system these days has the terminal + browser story covered, if you then use VS Code and languages like Go or Rust, you don’t really need to care what the OS is. Getting religious over any one pla…

Well I use Windows and Linux currently, with a hackintosh for macOS after a bad spell with a Mac. I find the Linux OS to be the best for programming, since it just runs everything like a breeze. Windows is what I use for Office since macOS office is clunky and I'm locked in to the Windows shortcuts. The issue with Macs for me is not the usability of the OS (apart from the lock in that Apple tried to do), but because…

A typical Catalina upgrade was closer to 30 minutes for our computers at work. 10 hours suggests some kind of problem.

Re: How Satya Nadella turned Microsoft around

#486
post #290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well VR is a thing now for $300. And there is tiktok and snapchat as far as social media goes. Companies are slowly marching to deliver AR as a product too. Consumer drones are another thing along with cheap digital large sensor cameras, and once something like waymo and boom delivers, those would be revolutions of their own. Also solar is cheaper than coal now as an energy source, and complete DNA sequencing now cos…

Am I the only that finds SM platforms like snapchat and tiktok infantile and vacuous? Say what you want about Facebook and Reddit, but in the right forums you can have thoughtful debates and discussions. I don't see TT and SC as anything but fads. TT is the same 10 or 15 takes on the same thing over and over and SC is just a 1 hit music star that somehow still lingers around.

tiktok good though. I like the community "clusters" the algorithm creates. Leads to a whole vareity of interesting content and stuff to watch explore

Re: How Satya Nadella turned Microsoft around

#487
post #439
post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the VSCode extension marketplace greatly helps with the huge breadth of tooling. Not sure if this is applicable to regular Visual Studio as well, I've honestly never used it.

Visual Studio (full edition) doesn't have extensions. It's a full blown IDE and everything is built-in. Despite having a similar name, the two products sharing almost nothing in common.

I'm pretty late to this, but Visual Studio (full edition) does have extensions. Resharper, for instance, is a popular Visual Studio extension.

https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/

Post reply on HN